Risks in Carbon Projects and How to Mitigate Them

Risks and Risk Mitigation in Carbon Projects

Introduction

Carbon projects are powerful tools for tackling climate change. Whether it’s protecting tropical forests, restoring mangroves, or distributing clean cookstoves, these initiatives generate carbon credits that finance sustainable development. But they also face a range of risks that can undermine their success. Investors worry about political instability, communities fear unfair benefit distribution, and developers struggle with price volatility. If these risks aren’t addressed, projects can fail — eroding trust in the carbon market.

The Carbon Finance Playbook highlights both the risks that carbon projects face and the strategies available to mitigate them. In this blog, we’ll explore the major categories of risk, real-world examples, and the financial and governance tools that can help make projects resilient.


Types of Risks in Carbon Projects
Visual summary of risk types in carbon projects: Project, Socio-economic & political, Environmental, and Market & financial risks, presented with relevant icons.

1. Political and Regulatory Risks

-Land Tenure Disputes: In many emerging markets, land rights are unclear. Conflicts between governments, communities, and private actors can derail projects.

-Policy Changes: Governments may impose taxes, royalties, or bans on carbon exports.

-Weak Governance: Lack of enforcement of environmental laws can reduce project credibility.

Example: Some African countries have debated placing heavy royalties on carbon credit sales, creating uncertainty for investors.


2. Financial Risks

-Carbon Price Volatility: Voluntary carbon market (VCM) prices fluctuate widely, from as low as $2 per ton to $40+ for premium credits.

-Liquidity Risk: Unlike compliance markets, VCMs remain small and fragmented. Selling credits can take time.

-Currency Risk: Most carbon credits trade in USD, but expenses are in local currency. Exchange rate shifts can hurt returns.

Example: A reforestation project in Latin America relying on pre-sale contracts at $10/ton may lose potential gains if market prices rise to $25/ton later.


3. Environmental Risks

-Permanence Risks: Forest fires, pests, or drought can wipe out carbon stocks.

-Leakage: Protecting one forest may push deforestation elsewhere.

-Additionality Concerns: Projects must prove they deliver carbon reductions beyond business-as-usual.

Example: In 2020, wildfires in U.S. forest offset projects raised concerns about permanence and buffer pool adequacy.


4. Social and Community Risks

-Lack of Community Buy-in: Projects may fail if they don’t engage Indigenous Peoples and Local Communities (IPLCs).

-Inequitable Benefit Sharing: If revenue doesn’t reach communities, disputes can arise.

-Reputation Risk: Negative media coverage can reduce demand for credits.

Example: REDD+ projects have faced criticism for not delivering promised benefits to communities, harming credibility.


5. Technical and MRV Risks

-Measurement Errors: Carbon calculations may be flawed.

-Verification Delays: Slow validation by registries can delay credit issuance.

-Technology Failures: Digital MRV systems may face challenges in remote areas.


Risk Mitigation Strategies
Infographic showing four key risk mitigation strategies in carbon projects: robust validation and verification, community engagement, thorough monitoring and assessment, and diversification.

1. Insurance Products

-Political Risk Insurance: Protects against expropriation, currency transfer restrictions, and civil unrest.

-Carbon Delivery Guarantees: Specialized insurance ensures buyers receive credits even if a project underperforms.

-Catastrophe Coverage: Insurance against fires, floods, or other natural disasters.

Example: Providers like Parhelion and Oka have developed carbon-specific insurance products.


2. Blended Finance

Combining concessional finance (grants or low-interest loans) with commercial capital spreads risk:

-Grants: Cover early-stage feasibility and community engagement.

-Concessional Debt: Provides low-cost capital for capital-intensive projects.

-Private Equity: Follows once risks are reduced.

Example: Donor-funded grants in Africa have de-risked early REDD+ projects, enabling private capital to flow.


3. Diversification

Investors can reduce exposure by:

-Spreading across geographies (Africa, Asia, Latin America).

-Investing in multiple project types (REDD+, ARR, Blue Carbon, Cookstoves).

-Combining removal and avoidance projects.


4. Strong Governance and Benefit Sharing Agreements (BSAs)

-Transparent governance ensures communities receive fair shares.

-Inclusive decision-making reduces conflict.

-Regular audits and reporting build trust with investors and buyers.


5. Buffer Pools and Reversal Mechanisms

-Many registries require a portion of credits to be set aside in a buffer pool.

-These credits cover losses from unexpected reversals like fires.

-Increases confidence in permanence.


6. Technology and dMRV

-Digital MRV (dMRV): Remote sensing, drones, and AI improve accuracy and reduce costs.

-Blockchain Solutions: Enhance transparency in credit tracking.

-Mobile Apps: Engage local monitors and communities in data collection.


Case Studies

Kenya – Solar Irrigation

SunCulture combined carbon credits with results-based finance. Insurance products helped attract investors by guaranteeing credit delivery.

Mozambique – REDD+

Projects faced land tenure challenges. Transparent BSAs and community involvement reduced conflict and built trust.

Peru – Reforestation

A buffer pool was used to manage permanence risk. Despite political uncertainty, diversified investor participation kept the project stable.


The Role of Investors and Donors

-Investors: Demand transparent risk disclosures and insist on insurance.

-Donors: Provide catalytic capital to de-risk early-stage projects.

-Corporates: Should prioritize high-integrity credits that use best-practice risk management.


The Future of Risk Management in Carbon Projects

Risk management is becoming more sophisticated:

-Insurance markets are expanding with carbon-specific products.

-Standardization under ICVCM is improving integrity.

-Article 6 frameworks are adding compliance-grade safeguards.

Technology is reducing MRV-related risks.

Still, challenges remain. Climate change itself increases environmental risks like droughts and fires, making robust safeguards even more critical.


Conclusion

Carbon projects in emerging markets offer enormous potential, but they face real risks — political, financial, environmental, and social. Ignoring these risks is not an option. To unlock the billions in climate finance needed, projects must adopt strong governance, leverage insurance, and use innovative tools like dMRV.

Mitigation is not just about protecting investors. It’s about ensuring that projects deliver lasting benefits for people, ecosystems, and the climate. With the right safeguards, carbon projects can move from fragile experiments to trusted pillars of the global carbon market.


About Anaxee:
Anaxee drives large-scale, country-wide Climate and Carbon Credit projects across India. We specialize in Nature-Based Solutions (NbS) and community-driven initiatives, providing the technology and on-ground network needed to execute, monitor, and ensure transparency in projects like agroforestry, regenerative agriculture, improved cookstoves, solar devices, water filters and more. Our systems are designed to maintain integrity and verifiable impact in carbon methodologies.

Beyond climate, Anaxee is India’s Reach Engine- building the nation’s largest last-mile outreach network of 100,000 Digital Runners (shared, tech-enabled field force). We help corporates, agri-focused companies, and social organizations scale to rural and semi-urban India by executing projects in 26 states, 540+ districts, and 11,000+ pin codes, ensuring both scale and 100% transparency in last-mile operations. Connect with Anaxee at sales@anaxee.com 

Field Support for Improved Cookstove Project in India