Carbon projects are powerful tools for tackling climate change. Whether it’s protecting tropical forests, restoring mangroves, or distributing clean cookstoves, these initiatives generate carbon credits that finance sustainable development. But they also face a range of risks that can undermine their success. Investors worry about political instability, communities fear unfair benefit distribution, and developers struggle with price volatility. If these risks aren’t addressed, projects can fail — eroding trust in the carbon market.
The Carbon Finance Playbook highlights both the risks that carbon projects face and the strategies available to mitigate them. In this blog, we’ll explore the major categories of risk, real-world examples, and the financial and governance tools that can help make projects resilient.
Types of Risks in Carbon Projects
1. Political and Regulatory Risks
-Land Tenure Disputes: In many emerging markets, land rights are unclear. Conflicts between governments, communities, and private actors can derail projects.
-Policy Changes: Governments may impose taxes, royalties, or bans on carbon exports.
-Weak Governance: Lack of enforcement of environmental laws can reduce project credibility.
Example: Some African countries have debated placing heavy royalties on carbon credit sales, creating uncertainty for investors.
2. Financial Risks
-Carbon Price Volatility: Voluntary carbon market (VCM) prices fluctuate widely, from as low as $2 per ton to $40+ for premium credits.
-Liquidity Risk: Unlike compliance markets, VCMs remain small and fragmented. Selling credits can take time.
-Currency Risk: Most carbon credits trade in USD, but expenses are in local currency. Exchange rate shifts can hurt returns.
Example: A reforestation project in Latin America relying on pre-sale contracts at $10/ton may lose potential gains if market prices rise to $25/ton later.
3. Environmental Risks
-Permanence Risks: Forest fires, pests, or drought can wipe out carbon stocks.
-Leakage: Protecting one forest may push deforestation elsewhere.
-Additionality Concerns: Projects must prove they deliver carbon reductions beyond business-as-usual.
Example: In 2020, wildfires in U.S. forest offset projects raised concerns about permanence and buffer pool adequacy.
4. Social and Community Risks
-Lack of Community Buy-in: Projects may fail if they don’t engage Indigenous Peoples and Local Communities (IPLCs).
-Inequitable Benefit Sharing: If revenue doesn’t reach communities, disputes can arise.
-Reputation Risk: Negative media coverage can reduce demand for credits.
Example: REDD+ projects have faced criticism for not delivering promised benefits to communities, harming credibility.
5. Technical and MRV Risks
-Measurement Errors: Carbon calculations may be flawed.
-Verification Delays: Slow validation by registries can delay credit issuance.
-Technology Failures: Digital MRV systems may face challenges in remote areas.
Risk Mitigation Strategies
1. Insurance Products
-Political Risk Insurance: Protects against expropriation, currency transfer restrictions, and civil unrest.
-Carbon Delivery Guarantees: Specialized insurance ensures buyers receive credits even if a project underperforms.
-Catastrophe Coverage: Insurance against fires, floods, or other natural disasters.
Example: Providers like Parhelion and Oka have developed carbon-specific insurance products.
2. Blended Finance
Combining concessional finance (grants or low-interest loans) with commercial capital spreads risk:
-Grants: Cover early-stage feasibility and community engagement.
-Concessional Debt: Provides low-cost capital for capital-intensive projects.
-Private Equity: Follows once risks are reduced.
Example: Donor-funded grants in Africa have de-risked early REDD+ projects, enabling private capital to flow.
3. Diversification
Investors can reduce exposure by:
-Spreading across geographies (Africa, Asia, Latin America).
-Investing in multiple project types (REDD+, ARR, Blue Carbon, Cookstoves).
-Combining removal and avoidance projects.
4. Strong Governance and Benefit Sharing Agreements (BSAs)
-Regular audits and reporting build trust with investors and buyers.
5. Buffer Pools and Reversal Mechanisms
-Many registries require a portion of credits to be set aside in a buffer pool.
-These credits cover losses from unexpected reversals like fires.
-Increases confidence in permanence.
6. Technology and dMRV
-Digital MRV (dMRV): Remote sensing, drones, and AI improve accuracy and reduce costs.
-Blockchain Solutions: Enhance transparency in credit tracking.
-Mobile Apps: Engage local monitors and communities in data collection.
Case Studies
Kenya – Solar Irrigation
SunCulture combined carbon credits with results-based finance. Insurance products helped attract investors by guaranteeing credit delivery.
Mozambique – REDD+
Projects faced land tenure challenges. Transparent BSAs and community involvement reduced conflict and built trust.
Peru – Reforestation
A buffer pool was used to manage permanence risk. Despite political uncertainty, diversified investor participation kept the project stable.
The Role of Investors and Donors
-Investors: Demand transparent risk disclosures and insist on insurance.
-Donors: Provide catalytic capital to de-risk early-stage projects.
-Corporates: Should prioritize high-integrity credits that use best-practice risk management.
The Future of Risk Management in Carbon Projects
Risk management is becoming more sophisticated:
-Insurance markets are expanding with carbon-specific products.
-Standardization under ICVCM is improving integrity.
-Article 6 frameworks are adding compliance-grade safeguards.
Technology is reducing MRV-related risks.
Still, challenges remain. Climate change itself increases environmental risks like droughts and fires, making robust safeguards even more critical.
Conclusion
Carbon projects in emerging markets offer enormous potential, but they face real risks — political, financial, environmental, and social. Ignoring these risks is not an option. To unlock the billions in climate finance needed, projects must adopt strong governance, leverage insurance, and use innovative tools like dMRV.
Mitigation is not just about protecting investors. It’s about ensuring that projects deliver lasting benefits for people, ecosystems, and the climate. With the right safeguards, carbon projects can move from fragile experiments to trusted pillars of the global carbon market.
About Anaxee: Anaxee drives large-scale, country-wide Climate and Carbon Credit projects across India. We specialize in Nature-Based Solutions (NbS) and community-driven initiatives, providing the technology and on-ground network needed to execute, monitor, and ensure transparency in projects like agroforestry, regenerative agriculture, improved cookstoves, solar devices, water filters and more. Our systems are designed to maintain integrity and verifiable impact in carbon methodologies.
Beyond climate, Anaxee is India’s Reach Engine- building the nation’s largest last-mile outreach network of 100,000 Digital Runners (shared, tech-enabled field force). We help corporates, agri-focused companies, and social organizations scale to rural and semi-urban India by executing projects in 26 states, 540+ districts, and 11,000+ pin codes, ensuring both scale and 100% transparency in last-mile operations. Connect with Anaxee at sales@anaxee.com
The global carbon market is placing increasing trust in biochar as one of the most promising tools for carbon dioxide removal (CDR). In 2023–2024, biochar accounted for more than 90% of all durable carbon removal deliveries in the voluntary carbon market.
But like any climate solution, biochar is not without risks. Critics often ask: Is the carbon really locked away? What if projects exaggerate? Can small kilns in rural areas be trusted to deliver verified credits?
These are important questions. A strong carbon market needs credibility, transparency, and risk management. This blog explores the main risks in biochar projects — and how innovators, developers, and standards are addressing them.
1. Non-Additionality Risk
What it means: For a project to generate carbon credits, it must prove that it would not have happened without carbon finance. If the activity is “business as usual,” then credits are not additional.
How it applies to biochar:
-If a farmer already makes biochar for soil improvement without carbon finance, issuing credits for the same activity risks double counting.
-Large industrial biomass users might switch to biochar anyway due to regulation or cost advantages, raising questions about additionality.
How to manage:
-Rely on clear baseline studies to show the biomass would have otherwise decomposed or been burned.
-Require third-party verification at project registration.
-Standards like Verra VM0044 and Puro.earth mandate strict baseline documentation.
2. Reversal Risk
What it means: Carbon stored today could be released tomorrow. In forestry projects, this often happens when trees burn or are cut down.
Why biochar is stronger: Biochar is much more chemically stable than biomass. Its carbon structures resist microbial decay, with lifespans of hundreds to thousands of years.
But risks still exist:
-Poorly made biochar (low pyrolysis temperatures, high volatile matter) may degrade faster.
-Fire in storage sites could destroy stockpiled biochar before application.
-Community-first models ensure social acceptance and equitable benefit-sharing.
Together, these approaches make biochar one of the lowest-risk removal credits compared to other methods like forestry or enhanced weathering.
Conclusion
Biochar is not risk-free, but its risks are identifiable, manageable, and often lower than other carbon removal pathways.
-Non-additionality is solved with clear baselines.
-Reversal risk is minimized through stable chemistry.
-Over-crediting is prevented by conservative methodologies.
-Leakage is reduced by strict feedstock rules.
-Delivery is secured through diversified networks.
For investors, corporates, and communities, this means biochar credits can be a trusted part of net zero strategies. The key lies in good governance, transparent MRV, and community-centered implementation.
In short: biochar projects succeed when risks are acknowledged, measured, and managed — not ignored.
About Anaxee:
Anaxee drives large-scale, country-wide Climate and Carbon Credit projects across India. We specialize in Nature-Based Solutions (NbS) and community-driven initiatives, providing the technology and on-ground network needed to execute, monitor, and ensure transparency in projects like agroforestry, regenerative agriculture, improved cookstoves, solar devices, water filters and more. Our systems are designed to maintain integrity and verifiable impact in carbon methodologies.
Beyond climate, Anaxee is India’s Reach Engine- building the nation’s largest last-mile outreach network of 100,000 Digital Runners (shared, tech-enabled field force). We help corporates, agri-focused companies, and social organizations scale to rural and semi-urban India by executing projects in 26 states, 540+ districts, and 11,000+ pin codes, ensuring both scale and 100% transparency in last-mile operations.
Anaxee Digital Runners Private Limited 303, Right-wing, (use Lift#1) New IT Park Building 3rd floor, Pardesi Pura Main Rd, Electronic Complex, Sukhlia, Indore,
Madhya Pradesh 452003
