Biochar Projects in India — Practical Guide to Design, MRV and Marketable Carbon Removals

Biochar Projects in India: From Soil Health to Marketable Carbon Removals — A Practical, No-Nonsense Guide for Developers and Buyers

Biochar can be a credible carbon-removal pathway and an agronomic input — but only if projects confront three messy realities head-on: (1) feedstock sourcing that avoids diversion or indirect emissions, (2) pyrolysis process control that guarantees carbon stability, and (3) soil carbon measurement that is conservative, repeatable and auditable. Buyers love the headline — “permanent carbon in the soil” — but verifiers and scientists will ask for lab analyses, decay-model transparency, and careful baseline/additionality. If Anaxee designs biochar pilots around traceable feedstock chains, validated pyrolysis lab certificates, conservative permanence factors, rigorous soil sampling and transparent benefit sharing, the credits will survive scrutiny and command a premium. If you shortcut any of these, expect pushback, discounting or reputational cost.


1. Why biochar? The promise, and the necessary skepticism

Biochar sits at a rare intersection: it can improve soil health, reduce nutrient/runoff losses, and lock carbon in a form scientists generally agree is more stable than uncharred biomass. That’s the promise. The skepticism is equally real: not all biochar is equal. The climate value depends on feedstock, pyrolysis temperature, residence time, and what happens to the biomass if not turned into char.

Key questions you must treat honestly from day one:

-What would the feedstock have been used for otherwise? (baseline displacement)

-Does producing biochar create a carbon debt in the supply chain? (collection, transport, drying)

-How stable is the char in your soil and climate? (decay rates vary)

-Are the agronomic benefits genuine and durable, or context-specific short-term gains?

These are not academic quibbles. They determine whether your credits are durable, additional and marketable.


2. What a biochar carbon project actually sells

Put simply: a biochar project sells carbon sequestration in a pyrogenic form — the fraction of carbon in the produced char that remains stable in soil for climate-relevant timescales (decades to centuries). Unlike tree planting (where permanence risks center on fire, harvest, land-use change), biochar permanence is about chemical stability and soil processes. You must convert a mass of feedstock into an auditable quantity of stable carbon, and then show that the soil retains it over time according to a conservative model.

There are two revenue streams (often intertwined):

  1. Carbon removals credits — the quantified, conservative estimate of long-term carbon sequestered in soil due to biochar application.

  2. Co-benefits monetisation (optional) — agronomic yield, reduced fertilizer need, water retention, local livelihoods; useful for impact buyers but must be evidence-backed.

Never oversell both simultaneously without rigorous evidence. Buyers will discount if agronomic benefits are speculative.


3. Feedstock: the core integrity issue

Feedstock choice is political, environmental and commercial. A project’s integrity rises or falls on whether feedstock sourcing causes direct or indirect emissions, food/forage competition, or land-use change.

Practical rules:

-Prefer waste residues: agricultural residues, processing waste, or invasive biomass that would otherwise rot, be burned openly, or require disposal. But don’t assume “waste” is free of competing uses — fodder, bedding, or brick kilns sometimes use the same residues. Document local usage.

-Avoid virgin wood from standing trees: converting live trees to char is almost never additional or acceptable.

-Traceability is mandatory: each feedstock batch should have a documented origin, weight, moisture content at intake, and a chain-of-custody record. Build simple field receipts with GPS and countersigned notes.

-Calculate opportunity cost: what the biomass would have been used for absent the project (baseline) must be defensible. If a residue is typically burned as fuel, turning it into biochar shifts emissions; if it was used as animal bedding, the analysis must capture that trade-off.

Don’t assume local communities won’t push back if residual value is expropriated; include stakeholders early in the feedstock policy and benefit-sharing plan.


4. Pyrolysis technology: temperature, yield, and stability

Pyrolysis — heating biomass in low-oxygen conditions — produces biochar, gases and bio-oil. The key control variables for carbon projects are:

-Temperature and residence time: higher temperatures typically increase aromaticity and carbon stability but reduce char yield per ton of feedstock. There’s a trade-off between quantity of char and its long-term stability. Projects must declare their operating point and justify how that maps to stability parameters.

-Process type: slow pyrolysis tends to yield more char; fast pyrolysis prioritises bio-oil. For carbon projects, slow, controlled pyrolysis is usually preferred for higher char yields.

-Char characterization: lab tests are mandatory. Measure fixed carbon fraction, volatile matter, ash content, aromaticity indicators (e.g., H/C ratio), and specific surface area (if claimed). These metrics feed into the decay model used in the PDD.

Operational imperatives:

-Use certified pyrolysis units with documented operating logs (temperature, feed rate, residence time). Don’t rely on “we ran it at ~500°C” claims without continuous monitoring logs.

-Retain representative char samples per batch and archive them for auditing. Randomly test samples in third-party labs to prevent bias.

-If your process lacks instrumented controls and archived logs, VVBs will treat your ex-ante carbon estimates with extreme scepticism.


5. How much carbon is stable? Measurement, modelling, and conservative accounting

This is the hard technical core for MRV teams: transforming a ton of biomass feedstock into an auditable amount of stable soil carbon.

Basic steps:

  1. Mass balance at the plant: measure dry mass of incoming feedstock and output char mass (all on dry mass basis). Keep moisture logs.

  2. Char carbon content: determine fixed carbon fraction (%) by lab analysis. Multiply output char mass × carbon fraction to get char C mass.

  3. Stability fraction: not all char C is permanent. Apply a conservative stability fraction (the share of char C expected to remain in soil after the relevant time horizon). That fraction must be justified with lab data and literature; use conservative estimates accepted by registries.

  4. Soil residence and fate: account for application loss pathways (runoff, erosion, ploughing depth changes) and any subsequent soil processes that can mineralise a portion of char C.

Two pragmatic rules:

-Use conservative stability factors in ex-ante claims (registries and buyers prefer lower, defensible numbers that survive scrutiny).

-Present sensitivity analyses: show best-estimate and conservative scenarios; buyers appreciate transparency and will prefer the conservative baseline.

Remember: verifiers will ask for the raw lab files, instrument calibration certificates, and chain-of-custody for samples.


6. Soil carbon measurement: sampling design and statistical basics

Counting soil carbon is expensive and error-prone if done badly. But it’s the gold standard for demonstrating real sequestration in situ, especially if you seek to show net soil C increases beyond the char carbon you applied (e.g., priming effects).

Design principles:

-Baseline sampling: collect soil cores across representative strata (soil type, cropping system, topography) before any application. Record depth increments (e.g., 0–10 cm, 10–30 cm). Baseline is non-negotiable.

-Control plots: where feasible, use randomized control plots (no-biochar) to detect non-biochar drivers of change. This strengthens additionality claims.

-Sufficient replication: soil C is spatially variable — sample sizes must produce confidence intervals that meet verifier requirements. Plan statistically (not heuristically).

-Standardised lab methods: use dry-combustion CHN analyzers for organic C determination; report uncertainty, detection limits, and QA/QC logs. Use the same lab and method across monitoring cycles.

-Re-sampling cadence: re-sample at conservative intervals — e.g., 1 year, 3 years, 5 years, depending on the registry and decadal permanence expectations. Soil carbon accrues slowly; don’t promise large near-term gains based solely on yield improvements.

If you cannot afford comprehensive soil sampling, you can still sell removals based on feedstock → char mass accounting with conservative stability fractions — but expect lower unit prices. Direct soil measurements command higher confidence and price if done well.


7. Additionality, leakage and co-impacts: the accounting perimeter

Biochar projects must pass the same additionality and leakage tests as other carbon projects.

-Additionality: demonstrate the biochar activity would not have happened without carbon revenue. This is tricky when small-scale entrepreneurs or agronomic experiments could scale without carbon finance. Build a clear financial model showing the project is not economically viable without carbon income (e.g., capital for pyrolysis units, logistics, or farmer incentives).

-Leakage: could using residues for char divert them from alternative uses, forcing replacement biomass harvesting elsewhere? Estimate such indirect effects and, if material, apply leakage deductions or buffer credits. Document assumptions transparently.

-Non-GHG co-impacts: soils can benefit (yield, water retention) or sometimes suffer (if char contains contaminants or changes soil pH). Monitor for unexpected negative impacts and include them in your social and environmental safeguards.

Don’t rely on wishful thinking. Verifiers will probe the baseline counterfactual and whether the project creates displacement of existing resource uses.


8. MRV practicalities: what your verification folder must contain

If you want a VVB to pass on first review, prepare this folder — it’s not optional:

-Feedstock logs: batch receipts, GPS origin, supplier contracts, moisture analysis, and sample archives.

-Pyrolysis logs: continuous temperature-time profiles, feed rates, unit run IDs, representative char yields per run.

-Lab certificates: char fixed carbon %, volatile matter, ash content, H/C ratios, lab calibration certificates, and lab chain-of-custody forms.

-Soil sampling files: baseline and follow-up core sample IDs, GPS, depth logs, lab results, and QA/QC checks.

-Mass-balance spreadsheet: raw data with calculations from feedstock dry mass → char mass → char C → stable C with clearly shown formulas. Maintain version control and preserve raw files.

-Project governance & community consent: feedstock access agreements, benefit sharing, and grievance mechanism records.

-Model documentation: the decay model and literature justification for chosen stability fractions and any factors applied.

If any of these elements are missing or poorly documented, the VVB will increase uncertainty factors or reject claims.


9. Costs and economics: realistic budgeting

Biochar projects have predictable cost centers. Budgeting conservatively avoids painful write-downs later.

Typical cost categories:

-Capital: pyrolysis units (from small mobile kilns to fixed industrial units). Quality, instrumented units cost more but provide audit trails.

-Feedstock logistics: collection, drying, grinding, transport. Moisture reduction is often a hidden cost — wet feedstock lowers yield and increases energy needs.

-Lab testing: batch char characterization and soil sample analysis. These are recurring and non-trivial.

-Soil sampling & MRV: field teams, coring equipment, transport, and lab costs.

-Operations & management: local teams, data processing, inventory systems.

-Verification & registry fees: VVB cycles and registry issuance costs.

-Buffer and contingencies: for permanence risks, leakage or lower-than-expected stability.

Do not underprice MRV and lab testing. They are the marginal cost that determines whether credits survive validation.


10. Commercialization: who buys biochar credits and why

Buyer demand varies. Typical buyer types and their motivations:

-High-integrity removals buyers (tech firms, net-zero pledgers): they want conservative, well-documented removals they can confidently book against targets. They will pay a premium for verifiable soil carbon with rigorous MRV.

-Impact buyers: NGOs or corporates interested in soil health and livelihoods may buy projects with demonstrable co-benefits even if carbon prices are modest.

-Commoditised buyers: traders looking for volume may accept lower MRV rigour at a discount; these are riskier counterparties.

Packaging matters: deliver small digital dashboards with char mass flows, archived lab files, and anonymised soil result extracts to high-integrity buyers. They will ask for chain-of-custody and may request spot re-tests.


11. Common pitfalls and how to avoid them

Be direct: many projects fail on avoidable errors. Avoid these:

-Weak chain-of-custody: failing to document feedstock origin exposes you to leakage accusations. Fix: standard receipts + GPS + supplier contracts.

-Poor pyrolysis controls: hand-built kilns without logs make stability claims impossible to justify. Fix: instrumented units and archived run logs.

-Insufficient soil sampling: tiny sample sizes produce wide confidence intervals and unreliable claims. Fix: consult a statistician and build a representative sampling frame.

-Over-claiming co-benefits: yield improvements are context-dependent; don’t promise what you can’t prove. Fix: conservative claims and pilot data.

-Ignoring community impacts: feedstock extraction can create local grievances if not consented and compensated. Fix: explicit benefit sharing and FPIC where applicable.

Shortcuts increase audit friction and ultimately lower project value.


12. Project design template — from pilot to program

Infographic: "Pilot Design — 5 Practical Steps" over a photo of biochar in a white tub; four panels read Phase 0: Scan; Phase 1: Pilot; Phase 2: Standardize; Phase 3: Commercialize.

Here is a practical stepwise blueprint Anaxee can replicate.

Phase 0 — Feasibility & stakeholder scan

-Map feedstock availability, current uses, and competing markets.

-Test community sentiment on feedstock use and land rights.

-Conduct an initial LCA scoping to identify high-risk upstream emissions.

Phase 1 — Pilot (replicable, data-centric)

-Install a pilot pyrolysis unit with full instrumentation.

-Produce char at controlled settings; archive samples.

-Run a small soil sampling regime (pilot control vs treated plots).

-Measure agronomic outcomes and perform preliminary farmer interviews.

-Build mass-balance spreadsheets and model stability fractions conservatively.

Phase 2 — Scale (standardise and govern)

-Standardise feedstock receipts and supplier contracts.

-Deploy certified pyrolysis units and train operators.

-Implement a central MRV hub for data ingestion, char archiving, and soil sample management.

-Create a benefit-sharing mechanism linking feedstock suppliers and smallholders to revenue streams (not just promises).

-Engage VVB early with pilot data to align monitoring expectations.

Phase 3 — Program & commercialization

-Aggregate across sites, harmonise PDD documentation and governance.

-Prepare buyer packages (conservative ex-ante claims + soil re-sampling schedule + QA documents).

-Price credits transparently accounting for buffer pools for risk.


13. PDD & MRV language: audit-ready clauses

Objective (sample):

“Quantify the amount of pyrogenic carbon sequestered in agricultural soils through application of conventionally produced biochar, using a conservative, auditable mass-balance approach (feedstock dry mass → char mass → char C → stable C) complemented by soil sampling for a subset of plots. All laboratory certificates, plant run logs, and chain-of-custody documentation will be retained in the project MRV repository and made available to the VVB.”

Monitoring approach (sample):

“Mass flow monitoring will record dry feedstock intake, char output mass, and batchwise char sampling for laboratory determination of fixed carbon. Soil cores from stratified representative plots (treatment and control) will be collected at baseline, Year 1, Year 3 and Year 5 and analysed using dry combustion. Ex-ante stable fraction assumptions will be conservative and justified with third-party lab tests and literature.”

Use these as starting points and make your numbers conservative.


14. Anaxee’s competitive playbook — where you must get ruthless

Infographic: "MRV Checklist — Biochar Projects" overlaying a close-up of biochar; panels list Feedstock Records, Pyrolysis Logs, Lab & Soil Tests, and Data & Governance.

Anaxee’s strengths (local teams, dMRV, last-mile execution) can make biochar commercially viable — but execution must be ruthless about documentation.

Concrete moves:

  1. Invest in one well-instrumented pilot: purchase a quality slow-pyrolysis unit with data logging; get char samples tested in reputable labs. This single pilot will define your PDD parameters.

  2. Standardise receipts and digitalise the supply chain: use simple mobile forms for supplier receipts with GPS and photos to create tamper-resistant evidence.

  3. Build a central MRV hub: ingest run logs, lab files, soil data and generate audit packs automatically. This reduces VVB time and fees.

  4. Offer a transparent benefit-share to suppliers: a fair, quick payment mechanism prevents grievances and secures feedstock.

  5. Pitch conservative credits to high-integrity buyers first: premium buyers will help establish price anchors.

Don’t try to be everything at once. Do one well-documented project, prove the model, then scale.


15. Hypothetical case study: a replicable pilot model

Context: Agro-processing clusters producing cassava/peanut shells in two districts, residues currently burned or left to rot.
Pilot size: 3,000 t/year feedstock capacity; expected char yield 15% dry mass.
Key controls: instrumented slow-pyrolysis unit, char batch archiving, lab char characterization, baseline soil sampling on 100 farm plots (50 control, 50 treatment).
Economics: feedstock payments to suppliers, capex amortised over 7 years, MRV and lab testing funded by early carbon forward sales at conservative price.
Risk mitigation: buffer pool allocation (5–10%), supplier contracts with grievance redress, drying yards to reduce moisture costs.

Outcome: conservative ex-ante carbon claim based on char mass × fixed C × conservative stability fraction; soil sampling used to validate and, over time, potentially increase confidence intervals and raise crediting volumes.


16. Buyer due diligence checklist (what buyers will ask)

Buyers who pay for removals will insist on:

-Mass-balance spreadsheet with raw feedstock & char logs.

-Laboratory certificates for char and soil analyses (with QA/QC).

-Chain-of-custody receipts for feedstock with GPS evidence.

-Pyrolysis run logs (temperature/time).

-Baseline, control plots, and soil sampling plan showing statistical adequacy.

-Evidence of supply-chain consent and benefit sharing.

If you can’t produce these in the first 72 hours, you will struggle to close quality buyers.


17. Ethics, community and co-benefits — don’t treat them as marketing copy

Biochar projects intersect livelihoods. If you extract biomass from smallholders without fair compensation, or if you promote feedstock diversion from animal bedding to char, you erode trust and create perverse outcomes. Document how suppliers are chosen, paid, and how their livelihoods are protected.

Co-benefits must be proven:

-Measure yield changes with randomized or matched control plots.

-Test soil health indicators (Cation Exchange Capacity, pH, available nutrients) for plausible agronomic claims.

-Be transparent about where biochar worked and where it didn’t — buyers appreciate honest reporting.


18. Final reality check — be conservative and transparent

Biochar is attractive. But the market will reward projects that are disciplined and transparent, not those that promise untested miracles. The correct posture is humility: treat ex-ante estimates as conservative hypotheses backed by lab and pilot data, not marketing copy. Buyers and verifiers will respect conservatism and clear audit trails.

If Anaxee wants to lead in biochar:

-Start with one instrumented pilot.

-Build standardised digital receipts and a central MRV hub.

-Use conservative stability fractions and publish sensitivity analyses.

-Prioritise feedstock traceability and supplier fairness.

-Engage a reputable VVB early with pilot data to align expectations.

Biochar can be both an effective soil amendment and a credible removal pathway — but only when the proofs are in the data, and that data is auditable.

Biochar and Soil Amendments in India: Durable Carbon Storage for Sustainable Agriculture

Introduction: Beyond Short-Term Carbon

The world’s carbon removal efforts often focus on trees and soils — vital, but vulnerable. Trees can burn, soil carbon can erode. True climate impact needs durability — carbon that stays locked away for decades or even centuries.

This is where biochar and other soil amendments come in.

Biochar is a stable, carbon-rich material produced by heating organic matter (like crop residues, wood waste, or manure) under low oxygen — a process called pyrolysis. When applied to soils, biochar not only improves fertility and water retention, but also stores carbon for hundreds to thousands of years.

For India — a nation where agriculture and waste management intersect — biochar represents a powerful, scalable, and high-quality carbon removal solution.

The 2025 Criteria for High-Quality Carbon Dioxide Removal highlight durability and environmental co-benefits as essential principles. Biochar checks both boxes.


 What Is Biochar?

Infographic titled “What is Biochar?” showing icons for heating biomass in a low-oxygen environment, improving soil fertility and water retention, and locking carbon in a stable form for centuries, with Anaxee branding.

Biochar is produced when organic biomass — crop residues, husks, twigs, or even municipal green waste — is heated in a low-oxygen environment. Unlike open burning (which releases CO₂), pyrolysis converts much of that carbon into a stable, solid form that resists decomposition.

When applied to soil:

-It enhances soil structure and nutrient retention.

-Increases microbial activity and root growth.

Infographic titled “Benefits of Biochar Application” featuring icons and text highlighting improved soil health, enhanced fertility, cost savings, and carbon sequestration, with Anaxee logo.

-Holds carbon in a stable state for centuries.

Simply put, it transforms agricultural waste into a permanent carbon sink.


Why Biochar Matters for India

1. Agriculture-Driven Economy

India’s 150+ million smallholder farmers generate vast crop residues. Many burn this biomass, contributing to air pollution and CO₂ emissions. Biochar converts that same waste into soil health and carbon credits.

2. Soil Degradation Crisis

Over 30% of Indian soils are degraded or nutrient-depleted. Biochar improves organic matter, pH balance, and water retention — directly improving productivity.

3. Climate Commitments

Under India’s Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs) and CCTS (Carbon Credit Trading Scheme), durable carbon removal like biochar will be crucial to long-term decarbonization.

4. Circular Economy Alignment

Biochar ties together agriculture, waste management, and carbon markets — converting local problems into revenue-generating, climate-positive outcomes.


Biochar and Soil Amendments: What’s the Difference?
Infographic titled “Biochar & Soil Amendments for Farmers” displaying icons representing additional income, government support, soil health & productivity, and waste utilization, over an agricultural background.

While “biochar” often gets the spotlight, soil amendments is a broader category.

Type Description Carbon Durability Example Application
Biochar Pyrolyzed biomass, highly stable carbon 100–1000 years Crop residue pyrolysis for farm use
Compost Organic matter decomposition 1–10 years Manure or green waste for fertility
Enhanced Rock Weathering Silicate mineral application capturing CO₂ 100–10,000 years Basalt dust on farmlands
Organic Manures / Vermicompost Natural nutrient recycling 1–5 years Fertility boost, low permanence

Biochar stands out for durability, but its synergy with other amendments (like compost or rock dust) maximizes soil and carbon benefits — a strategy Anaxee is deploying at scale.


What Makes Biochar “High-Quality” Carbon Removal?

The 2025 Criteria for High-Quality CDR define three pillars for durable removals:

1. Measurement and MRV

Every tonne of carbon must be quantifiable, traceable, and verifiable.

-Biochar MRV involves tracking feedstock type, pyrolysis temperature, and application rate.

-Anaxee’s dMRV system records all these in real time using mobile apps and satellite-linked systems.

2. Durability

Carbon in biochar is chemically stable. Studies show >80% of carbon remains sequestered after 100 years.
This makes biochar one of the most durable CDR pathways available today.

3. Environmental Co-Benefits

High-quality projects enhance soil health, reduce pollution, and improve yields.
Biochar projects align perfectly with climate justice and environmental integrity — avoiding trade-offs like monoculture plantations or fertilizer overuse.


The MRV Challenge (and Opportunity)

Biochar’s credibility depends on robust data — how much carbon is actually stored and for how long.
Traditional MRV struggles with:

-Inconsistent feedstock records

-Lack of local lab analysis

-Fragmented data management

Anaxee’s Digital MRV (dMRV) overcomes this through:

-Geotagged data on biomass source and pyrolysis unit.

-Automated reporting of application areas.

-Satellite imagery cross-verification.

-Blockchain-based data integrity (for future registry integration).

Result: Lower verification costs, faster credit issuance, and traceable impact.


Anaxee’s Biochar and Soil Amendment Model

Infographic titled “Anaxee’s Biochar Workflow” showing five key stages — Feedstock, Pyrolysis, dMRV, Application, and Durability — represented by green icons on a beige background with Anaxee branding.

Anaxee integrates biochar into its Tech for Climate execution ecosystem, connecting farmers, technology, and markets:

1. Feedstock Collection via Digital Runners

-Rural Digital Runners mobilize local crop residue collection.

-Prevents burning and creates a carbon-positive supply chain.

2. Decentralized Pyrolysis Units

-Small-scale, locally operated pyrolysis units convert biomass to biochar.

-Supports village-level entrepreneurship.

3. dMRV Tracking

-Every batch of biochar is logged with feedstock details, GPS, timestamp, and application area.

-Farmers and buyers can trace carbon from field to registry.

4. Application and Soil Benefits

-Biochar applied on degraded farmlands increases yield, water retention, and soil carbon content.

-Results shared with buyers and verifiers through Anaxee dashboards.

5. Long-Term Durability

-Once sequestered, carbon in biochar remains stable for centuries.

-Regular satellite checks ensure no reversal or land-use change.

Anaxee thus bridges tech-enabled monitoring with community-centered implementation — ensuring carbon removals are real, durable, and fair.


Biochar in Carbon Markets

1. Growing Global Demand

Buyers like Microsoft, Shopify, and Carbonfuture are investing heavily in durable removals, including biochar. Credits fetch $100–$300 per tonne, far above typical forestry credits.

2. Emerging Methodologies

Standards like Puro.Earth, Verra’s Biochar Methodology, and Charm Industrial’s model are shaping a robust global market.

3. India’s Potential

With abundant biomass, low-cost labor, and supportive policy, India could become a biochar export powerhouse — provided quality and verification match global expectations.

Anaxee is positioning its projects to align with these premium markets, offering corporates traceable, durable, and community-positive credits.


The Co-Benefits: Climate, Soil, and People

High-quality biochar projects go beyond carbon:

Impact Area Description Example
Climate Long-term CO₂ sequestration, reduced burning Avoids stubble burning emissions
Soil Health Improved fertility, moisture retention, structure Higher yields for smallholders
Air Quality Eliminates crop-burning smoke Cleaner air in rural belts
Livelihoods Adds rural income via carbon finance Farmer revenue + local jobs
Circular Economy Reuses waste, reduces landfill Biomass → Biochar → Soil health

This is carbon removal that benefits both people and planet.


India’s Biochar Future

India’s next agricultural revolution won’t come from fertilizers — it’ll come from carbon-smart farming.
By 2030, India could:

-Produce 50 million tonnes of biochar annually,

-Sequester over 100 million tonnes of CO₂e, and

-Create millions of rural green jobs.

With the right infrastructure, MRV, and financing, biochar could become India’s signature carbon removal export.


Conclusion: Building Durability into India’s Carbon Story

Carbon markets are evolving fast. The next wave is about durability, traceability, and co-benefits — not just offsets.
Biochar embodies all three.

The 2025 Criteria for High-Quality CDR call for long-lasting, verifiable, socially just solutions.
Anaxee’s biochar model — integrating tech, communities, and dMRV — shows how India can lead this frontier.

As carbon buyers shift from “cheap” to credible, projects like Anaxee’s will define the new gold standard.


👉 Call to Action
Partner with Anaxee to scale biochar and soil carbon projects that deliver durable climate impact and rural prosperity across India.


About Anaxee:

 Anaxee drives/develops large-scale, country-wide Climate and Carbon Credit projects across India. We specialize in Nature-Based Solutions (NbS) and community-driven initiatives, providing the technology and on-ground network needed to execute, monitor, and ensure transparency in projects like agroforestry, regenerative agriculture, improved cookstoves, solar devices, water filters and more. Our systems are designed to maintain integrity and verifiable impact in carbon methodologies.

Beyond climate, Anaxee is India’s Reach Engine- building the nation’s largest last-mile outreach network of 100,000 Digital Runners (shared, tech-enabled field force). We help corporates, agri-focused companies, and social organizations scale to rural and semi-urban India by executing projects in 26 states, 540+ districts, and 11,000+ pin codes, ensuring both scale and 100% transparency in last-mile operations. Connect with Anaxee at sales@anaxee.com 

 

 

IETA VCM Guidelines 2.0 Explained: High-Integrity Carbon Credits & Anaxee’s Role

IETA VCM Guidelines 2.0 Explained: High-Integrity Carbon Credits & Anaxee’s Role

Introduction

The world is racing against time. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) has made it painfully clear: global emissions must peak immediately and almost halve by 2030 to keep the 1.5°C target alive. Yet, corporate climate action is not keeping pace. Many companies either lack credible net zero targets or are falling behind on their commitments.

In this landscape, the Voluntary Carbon Market (VCM) plays a critical role. It offers companies a flexible, cost-effective pathway to complement internal decarbonisation with credible climate action. But trust in the VCM has been shaken by concerns over quality, transparency, and inconsistent standards. That’s why the International Emissions Trading Association (IETA) released the updated VCM Guidelines 2.0 in September 2025.

These guidelines set out a roadmap for high-integrity use of verified carbon credits (VCCs)—ensuring that offsets go beyond being just “carbon accounting tools” and instead become powerful levers for real climate impact.

For India, where carbon markets are still evolving and the government is piloting mechanisms like the Carbon Credit Trading Scheme (CCTS), aligning with international integrity standards is crucial. And this is where Anaxee Digital Runners Pvt. Ltd. steps in—as India’s climate execution engine, ensuring that global principles of integrity translate into real action on the ground.


Section 1: The State of the Voluntary Carbon Market

The VCM has grown into a multi-billion-dollar ecosystem. By allowing companies to buy Verified Carbon Credits (VCCs) from projects that reduce or remove emissions, it creates a financial channel to scale climate solutions, from afforestation to renewable energy.

But after peaking in 2021, voluntary retirements of carbon credits stagnated. Several reasons explain this slowdown:

-Reputational risks: Companies fear being accused of “greenwashing” if their credit purchases are seen as low-quality or tokenistic.

-Quality concerns: Not all carbon credits are equal. Some projects failed to deliver the promised climate benefits.

-Regulatory uncertainty: Different frameworks—VCMI, ICVCM, SBTi, ISO—provide overlapping but inconsistent guidance.

-Market complexity: With multiple registries, methodologies, and rules, corporates face confusion about what counts as “credible” action.

Yet, demand for high-quality carbon credits remains essential. According to IETA’s modelling, international carbon markets could cut global mitigation costs by up to 32%. And for countries like India, carbon markets can unlock vital climate finance to support communities, smallholder farmers, and nature-based solutions.

The IETA Guidelines 2.0 are designed to address these bottlenecks and restore trust.


Section 2: What Are the IETA VCM Guidelines 2.0?

IETA first launched its high-integrity guidelines in April 2024. Version 2.0, released in September 2025, builds on feedback from corporates, governments, and independent initiatives. The goal: create clear, pragmatic rules for companies that want to integrate carbon credits into their net zero strategies without losing credibility.

The guidelines outline seven pillars of integrity:

  1. Demonstrate support for the Paris Agreement goals – Companies must set science-based targets aligned with 1.5°C.

  2. Quantify and disclose Scope 1, 2, and 3 emissions – No shortcuts. Transparency is non-negotiable.

  3. Establish a net zero pathway and near-term targets – Companies must show measurable interim steps, not vague 2050 promises.

  4. Use VCCs in line with the mitigation hierarchy – Prioritise internal reductions first, use credits only for what cannot be abated.

  5. Ensure only high-quality credits are used – Credits must be additional, verifiable, permanent, and issued by credible standards.

  6. Transparent accounting and disclosure – Report gross vs. net emissions, credit vintages, registries, and methodologies used.

  7. Make robust and credible claims – Companies must avoid misleading labels like “carbon neutral” unless they meet strict conditions.

This framework sends a strong message: carbon credits are not excuses; they are enablers of ambitious decarbonisation.


Section 3: Why High-Integrity Use Matters

The credibility of the VCM hinges on integrity. When companies misuse credits—buying cheap offsets while continuing business-as-usual emissions—they undermine trust in the entire system.

This has real consequences:

-NGOs and watchdogs accuse corporates of greenwashing.

-Regulators consider tightening rules, adding compliance risks.

-Investors lose confidence in ESG disclosures.

-Genuine climate finance flows to vulnerable regions slow down.

High-integrity use ensures that:

-Every credit corresponds to a real, measurable emission reduction or removal.

-Companies are transparent about how credits fit into their climate strategy.

-VCM finance actually accelerates global net zero, instead of being a distraction.

IETA’s Guidelines are therefore as much about protecting corporate reputations as they are about protecting the climate.


Section 4: Corporate Use Cases of VCCs

One of the strengths of the IETA Guidelines 2.0 is their recognition of multiple legitimate use cases for carbon credits. Instead of seeing credits only as end-of-pipe offsets, the guidelines outline broader roles:

  1. Meeting Interim Targets – Companies can use credits to stay accountable in the 2020s and 2030s, while technology solutions scale up.

  2. Staying on Track – If a company falls behind its science-based trajectory, credits can bridge the gap temporarily.

  3. Insetting – Credits generated within a company’s supply chain (e.g., regenerative agriculture projects) to cut Scope 3 emissions.

  4. Counterbalancing Residual Emissions – At net zero, credits are vital to address unavoidable emissions.

  5. Addressing Historical Emissions – Ambitious companies can go further by compensating for their legacy impact.

  6. Going Beyond Net Zero – Contributing extra credits to accelerate global decarbonisation.

This flexible approach makes credits not just compliance tools, but strategic assets for companies that want to demonstrate climate leadership.


Section 5: VCC Quality and Risk Management

Not all credits are created equal. IETA emphasizes strict quality filters:

-Additionality – Projects must deliver emission reductions that wouldn’t have happened otherwise.

-Permanence – Risks of reversal (e.g., forest fires) must be managed via buffers or insurance.

-Verification – Independent auditors must validate methodologies and outcomes.

-Transparency – Project details, vintages, and retirement records must be public.

Emerging tools to support quality include:

-ICVCM’s Core Carbon Principles (CCPs)

-Carbon rating agencies (CRAs) like Sylvera and BeZero

-Carbon insurance products to mitigate project failure risks

The message is clear: a credit with integrity is an investment in climate stability; a poor-quality credit is a liability.


Section 6: Policy & Market Convergence

Carbon markets are no longer siloed. Voluntary and compliance frameworks are converging:

-Under Article 6 of the Paris Agreement, countries can use VCCs to meet their Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs).

-Domestic markets (California ETS, Singapore carbon tax, China ETS) already allow limited use of credits.

-India’s Carbon Credit Trading Scheme (CCTS) is preparing to integrate credits into regulated trading.

For corporates, this convergence means two things:

  1. Credits used voluntarily today may soon count under compliance.

  2. Regulatory scrutiny on claims will only increase.

Aligning with IETA’s guidelines now helps companies future-proof their climate strategies.


Section 7: What This Means for India

India is at the center of the climate-finance equation. As a fast-growing economy and one of the world’s largest emitters, India must decarbonise without stalling development.

The VCM offers three major opportunities for India:

-Channel private finance into nature-based solutions (NbS) like agroforestry, mangroves, and soil carbon.

-Support smallholder farmers and rural communities by making them stakeholders in carbon markets.

-Position Indian corporates to meet global supply chain expectations around net zero and Scope 3 accounting.

But to tap this opportunity, integrity is non-negotiable. Projects must avoid leakage, ensure permanence, and deliver verifiable co-benefits. That’s where local execution capacity becomes critical.


Section 8: Anaxee’s Value in This Context

For international buyers and Indian corporates, the biggest question is: who will ensure integrity on the ground?

This is where Anaxee Digital Runners Pvt. Ltd. adds unique value:

  1. Execution Engine at Scale

    -With 125+ professionals and a network of 40,000+ Digital Runners, Anaxee can implement and monitor projects across India’s villages and farmlands.
    -This local capacity solves the biggest bottleneck: execution.

  2. dMRV & Transparency Tools

    -Anaxee integrates satellite monitoring, AI-driven analytics, and mobile-based data collection.
    -This ensures census-level verification, making every credit auditable, transparent, and trustworthy.

  3. Community Engagement

    -Projects are designed with farmer and community participation, ensuring permanence and social co-benefits.
    -This aligns with IETA’s emphasis on stakeholder consultation and just transition.

  4. Risk Reduction for Corporates

    -By ensuring credits meet international quality standards, Anaxee reduces reputational and compliance risks for buyers.

  5. Alignment with IETA Guidelines

    -Scope 1–3 emissions tracking for clients → supports disclosure.
    -High-quality, verified credits → ensures integrity.
    -Transparent registries and reporting → supports guideline 6.
    -Enabling corporates to make credible claims → prevents greenwashing.

In short: Anaxee translates IETA’s global guidelines into Indian ground reality.


Conclusion

The IETA VCM Guidelines 2.0 are more than a policy paper. They are a blueprint for credibility in carbon markets. By following them, companies can avoid greenwashing, build trust, and channel finance into solutions that truly matter.

But guidelines alone cannot deliver impact. Execution on the ground—across diverse geographies, communities, and ecosystems—remains the missing link.

That’s where Anaxee steps in. With its blend of last-mile execution, community partnerships, and technology-driven monitoring, Anaxee ensures that every carbon credit is real, additional, and trustworthy.

For corporates navigating India’s climate market, this means confidence:

-Confidence that credits are high-quality.

-Confidence that investments are future-proof.

-Confidence that climate claims will stand scrutiny.

The voluntary carbon market is at a crossroads. It can either regain credibility and scale—or stagnate under distrust. With IETA’s guidelines and Anaxee’s execution capacity, there’s a clear pathway forward: climate action with integrity.


 About Anaxee:

 Anaxee drives/develops large-scale, country-wide Climate and Carbon Credit projects across India. We specialize in Nature-Based Solutions (NbS) and community-driven initiatives, providing the technology and on-ground network needed to execute, monitor, and ensure transparency in projects like agroforestry, regenerative agriculture, improved cookstoves, solar devices, water filters and more. Our systems are designed to maintain integrity and verifiable impact in carbon methodologies.

Beyond climate, Anaxee is India’s Reach Engine- building the nation’s largest last-mile outreach network of 100,000 Digital Runners (shared, tech-enabled field force). We help corporates, agri-focused companies, and social organizations scale to rural and semi-urban India by executing projects in 26 states, 540+ districts, and 11,000+ pin codes, ensuring both scale and 100% transparency in last-mile operations. Connect with Anaxee atsales@anaxee.com 

Scope 1, 2, and 3 Emissions Explained: A Complete Guide for Businesses

Introduction: Why Are Scope 1, 2, and 3 Important?

Every business today faces the same question: How sustainable are your operations?

Governments, investors, customers, and even employees want answers. And when companies reply, they don’t just talk about their own fuel use or electricity bills. They speak in the language of Scope 1, 2, and 3 emissions.

Infographic showing Scope 1, Scope 2, and Scope 3 emissions categories with icons of factory, electricity grid, supplier truck, and waste bin.

These three categories, defined by the Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Protocol, have become the global framework for measuring and reporting emissions. Without them, climate commitments like Net Zero by 2050 would remain vague promises.

But while Scope 1 and Scope 2 are relatively easy to understand, Scope 3 is the real challenge. It extends far beyond a company’s direct operations, covering suppliers, customers, and waste streams.

In this guide, we’ll break down each scope, provide examples from different industries, explain why Scope 3 dominates discussions, and finally show how Anaxee Digital Runners brings technology and community power together to make Scope accounting and reduction practical on the ground.


The GHG Protocol and Its Scopes

The GHG Protocol Corporate Standard, developed by the World Resources Institute (WRI) and the World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD), is the most widely used carbon accounting framework.

It divides corporate emissions into three “scopes”:

-Scope 1: Direct emissions from owned or controlled sources.

-Scope 2: Indirect emissions from purchased energy.

-Scope 3: All other indirect emissions in the value chain.

This classification helps businesses:

  1. Avoid double counting.

  2. Compare performance across industries.

  3. Identify where emissions reductions are most impactful.


Infographic with examples of Scope 1, 2, and 3 emissions: manufacturing facilities, purchased electricity, business travel and waste.

Scope 1 Emissions — Direct and Visible

Scope 1 is the most straightforward category. It includes emissions from sources that a company owns or controls.

Examples:

-Burning fuel in company-owned vehicles, generators, or boilers.

-On-site industrial processes, such as chemical production or steelmaking.

-Fugitive emissions from refrigeration, air conditioning, or gas leaks.

Sector snapshots:

-Manufacturing: Gas-fired furnaces, diesel forklifts.

-Logistics: Truck fleets running on petrol or diesel.

-Agriculture: Methane from company-owned livestock herds.

Why it matters:
Scope 1 represents a company’s most visible footprint. These are the emissions regulators and communities often point to when discussing local air quality or compliance with national targets.

Reduction strategies:

-Transition company fleets to EVs or CNG.

-Replace oil-fired boilers with solar thermal systems.

-Improve process efficiency using automation and data monitoring.


Scope 2 Emissions — The Outsourced Chimney

Scope 2 covers emissions from purchased energy — electricity, heat, or steam.

Examples:

-An IT company powering data centers with coal-heavy grid electricity.

-A textile factory buying steam from a district heating plant.

-Office spaces running on air conditioning powered by fossil-fuel grids.

These emissions don’t occur inside the company fence line. They occur at the power plant that generates the electricity. But since the company consumes that energy, it bears responsibility.

Sector snapshots:

-Tech & IT: Data centers are Scope 2 heavy.

-Retail chains: Electricity for lighting, cooling, and refrigeration.

-Hospitals: High power consumption for equipment and HVAC.

Reduction strategies:

-Purchase renewable electricity via PPAs (Power Purchase Agreements).

-Install rooftop solar or captive renewable plants.

-Improve building energy efficiency (LEDs, insulation, HVAC upgrades).

👉 Scope 2 is often the low-hanging fruit for businesses aiming to quickly cut emissions.


Scope 3 Emissions — The Giant in the Room

Scope 3 is the most complex — and usually the largest — part of a company’s footprint. It covers all other indirect emissions in the value chain.

Examples:

-Extraction and processing of purchased raw materials.

-Business travel and employee commuting.

-Transportation and logistics of goods.

-Use of sold products (fuel in cars, electricity in appliances).

-End-of-life disposal (waste, recycling, landfilling).

Why Scope 3 matters:

-For consumer goods companies, Scope 3 can make up 90–95% of total emissions.

-For banks, investments in carbon-intensive industries fall under Scope 3.

-For oil companies, customer use of fuels is Scope 3 and dwarfs Scope 1 and 2.

Sector snapshots:

-Automotive: Customer driving (fuel combustion) is the largest Scope 3.

-Food industry: Farming inputs and supply chains dominate Scope 3.

-Fashion: Raw material production (cotton, polyester), logistics, and waste.

Challenges:

-Data gaps: Companies rely on suppliers for accurate information.

-Complexity: Thousands of suppliers, multiple geographies.

-Double counting risks: One company’s Scope 3 may be another’s Scope 1.

Reduction strategies:

-Collaborate with suppliers on low-carbon materials.

-Design products for circularity (reuse, recycling).

-Offer low-carbon alternatives (EVs, energy-efficient appliances).

-Influence customer behavior through product innovation.

👉 Scope 3 isn’t optional anymore. Regulators and investors increasingly expect full disclosure.


Step-by-step infographic titled "Steps to Measure Greenhouse Gas Emissions," listing organizational boundaries, data collection, total emissions calculation, and reduction targets.
Why Splitting into Scopes Makes Sense

The three-scope framework exists for a reason:

  1. Clarity: Companies know what they are directly responsible for.

  2. Comparability: Industries can benchmark performance.

  3. Accountability: Prevents multiple companies from claiming the same reductions.

For instance, a coal power plant counts emissions as Scope 1. A manufacturing company using that power counts them as Scope 2. The suppliers and customers downstream consider relevant portions under Scope 3.

This layered approach creates a global map of carbon responsibility.


Case Studies Across Industries

-IBM: Reduced Scope 2 emissions in Texas by switching to wind power, cutting 4,100 tonnes of CO₂ annually.

-DHL Sweden: Found 98% of emissions came from outsourced logistics (Scope 3).

-Tata Steel: Tracks Scope 1 and 2 using digital systems, aligning with global benchmarks.

-Ford Motor Company: Expanded inventory to include Scope 3, enabling it to join emissions trading programs. These examples show how companies worldwide are aligning business strategy with the GHG Protocol.


Common Pitfalls in Scope Reporting

-Over-focusing on Scope 1: Easy to measure, but often small compared to Scope 3.

-Ignoring suppliers: Without supplier data, Scope 3 becomes guesswork.

-Greenwashing: Selective disclosure without full transparency.

-Static reporting: Failing to update inventories as supply chains evolve.

The lesson? All three scopes matter — and need continuous updating.


The Future of Scope Accounting

The world is moving toward mandatory carbon disclosure.

-The EU’s CSRD (Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive) requires detailed scope reporting.

-The US SEC is considering Scope 3 disclosure for listed companies.

-India’s BRSR (Business Responsibility and Sustainability Reporting) framework is pushing corporates in this direction.

Science-Based Targets initiative (SBTi) also mandates that companies include Scope 3 if it makes up more than 40% of their total footprint.

The future is clear: Scope 3 disclosure will be non-negotiable.


How Anaxee Adds Value

Here’s where Anaxee Digital Runners steps in. Managing Scopes isn’t just about reporting — it’s about execution on the ground.

Anaxee brings a unique combination of Tech + Community:

-Digital Runners Network: 40,000+ trained local people across India collecting last-mile data, ensuring accurate Scope 1–3 inventories.

-dMRV Tools: Digital monitoring, reporting, and verification systems that replace outdated spreadsheets.

-Community Engagement: Scope 3 depends heavily on supplier and consumer behavior. Anaxee’s grassroots presence helps companies drive awareness and behavior change.

-Implementation Power: From agroforestry to renewable adoption, Anaxee doesn’t just advise — it executes projects across thousands of villages.

-Transparency Dashboards: Real-time visibility for corporates to track reductions against Scope targets.

For businesses in India and global investors looking at Nature-based Solutions (NbS), Anaxee provides the execution muscle and tech backbone to actually deliver reductions, not just commitments.


Conclusion: Turning Scopes into Action

Scopes 1, 2, and 3 give companies a complete picture of their carbon footprint.

-Scope 1 is about direct control.

-Scope 2 is about the energy you rely on.

-Scope 3 is about the full value chain.

The hard truth? Scope 3 is the elephant in the room — but also the biggest opportunity. Companies that master it will not only cut emissions but also build resilience, efficiency, and stronger brands.

And with partners like Anaxee, businesses don’t have to navigate this alone. Anaxee’s Tech for Climate approach brings credibility, scale, and ground-level execution to help companies not just measure emissions — but reduce them, for real.

Because in the end, what matters isn’t just counting carbon. It’s cutting it.


Afforestation and Reforestation in India: Scaling High-Quality Carbon Removal with Anaxee

Introduction: Trees as a Climate Solution

Trees are one of the most iconic symbols of climate action. They pull carbon from the atmosphere, provide oxygen, restore biodiversity, and improve livelihoods. Afforestation (planting trees where none existed) and reforestation (restoring degraded forests) together are known as ARR projects.

Globally, ARR is one of the most widely adopted pathways in carbon markets. In India, with its vast degraded lands and dependence on agriculture and forests, ARR has immense potential.

But ARR also faces heavy scrutiny. Many projects promise more than they deliver: trees that never survive, monoculture plantations that harm biodiversity, or communities left out of benefits.

The 2025 Criteria for High-Quality CDR stress that ARR projects must be measured, durable, and just. That’s where Anaxee steps in—with last-mile reach, dMRV tools, and community-first models.


What Is ARR (Afforestation and Reforestation)?

ARR projects include:

-Afforestation: Establishing forests on land that has not been forested for decades.

-Reforestation: Restoring forests on degraded or recently deforested lands.

-Agroforestry & Bund Plantations: Integrating trees into farms, hedges, and bunds.

Carbon is stored in:

-Above-ground biomass (trees, shrubs, understory).

-Below-ground biomass (roots).

-Soils (improved organic matter).

Done right, ARR not only removes carbon but delivers ecosystem resilience, biodiversity, and livelihoods.


Why ARR Matters for India

1. Huge Degraded Land Base

India has over 30 million hectares of degraded land—an untapped opportunity for carbon removal and ecosystem restoration.

2. Rural Livelihoods

Tree planting provides fuel, fodder, fruits, and timber—direct benefits for farmers and communities. With carbon finance, ARR becomes a long-term income stream.

3. Climate Targets

India’s NDCs under the Paris Agreement call for creating an additional 2.5–3 billion tonnes of CO₂ equivalent carbon sink by 2030 through forests and trees. ARR is central to this goal.


What Makes High-Quality ARR Projects?

The 2025 Criteria define key principles:

1. Social and Environmental Justice

-Avoid land grabs.

-Secure community consent and benefits.

-Respect Indigenous rights and cultural landscapes.

2. Biodiversity and Ecosystem Integrity

-No monoculture plantations in natural ecosystems.

-Native species, mixed forests, and landscape restoration.

3. Additionality and Baselines

-Projects must prove trees would not have grown without carbon finance.

-Conservative baselines for carbon stock.

4. MRV and Transparency

-Geotagged planting data.

-Satellite and ground verification.

-Independent third-party audits.

5. Durability

-Fire, drought, pests—ARR faces reversal risks. Projects must plan long-term maintenance and insurance buffers.

6. Leakage Control

-Ensure planting here doesn’t drive deforestation elsewhere.


The Challenges of ARR
Infographic titled “Challenges in ARR” with icons representing project risks, community engagement, financial sustainability, and logistics & monitoring, shown alongside a field worker wearing Anaxee branding in a forest background.

-Low Survival Rates: Many plantation drives see <30% survival after a few years.

-Monocultures: Quick-growing species like eucalyptus harm ecosystems.

-Short-Termism: Projects collapse after initial funding.

-Community Exclusion: Farmers and locals often see no benefits.

This is why ARR projects face skepticism. To be credible, they must deliver quality, not just quantity.


Anaxee’s Approach to High-Quality ARR

Infographic titled “Anaxee’s ARR Model” with four icons representing Tech, Community, MRV, and Durability, displayed horizontally against a forest background.

Anaxee ensures ARR projects meet global standards while delivering local value.

1. Last-Mile Reach

-40,000+ Digital Runners mobilize communities across 26 states.

-Farmers are trained and incentivized for long-term tree care.

2. dMRV Tools

-Geotagged planting records.

-Satellite + AI analysis for growth monitoring.

-Transparent dashboards for buyers and auditors.

3. Community-Centric Models

-Farmers own trees and share carbon revenue.

-Livelihood benefits: fruit, timber, fodder.

-Inclusive participation—women, youth, marginalized groups.

4. Survival & Durability

-Focus on native, climate-resilient species.

-Long-term contracts ensure trees are protected.

-Maintenance supported by community agreements.

5. Transparency & Global Compliance

-Projects aligned with Verra (ARR methodologies), Gold Standard, and 2025 Criteria.

-Buyers receive auditable, traceable credits.


Case Example: Bund Plantations in Madhya Pradesh

Anaxee has pioneered bund plantations—trees planted along farm bunds:

-Carbon Removal: Sequesters carbon in biomass + soils.

-Farmer Benefits: Provides fodder, shade, and reduced erosion.

-Traceability: Each tree is geotagged and tracked in dMRV.

-Durability: Farmers protect trees because they share in revenue.

This model combines climate action, community income, and transparent reporting—a blueprint for scaling ARR in India.


India’s Global ARR Opportunity

Global buyers are looking for high-quality ARR credits:

-Microsoft, Shell, and major corporates invest in forest carbon.

-ARR credits trade actively in voluntary markets.

-Compliance markets (like India’s CCTS) may also integrate ARR soon.

If ARR in India meets quality benchmarks, it can:

-Unlock billions in carbon finance.

-Restore degraded landscapes.

-Create millions of rural jobs.


Scaling ARR: Quality over Hype

The world has seen too many “plant a billion trees” campaigns with little impact. The future is not about numbers—it’s about verified, durable, community-led ARR projects.

Scaling ARR requires:

-Quality-first design.

-Digital MRV for transparency.

-Farmer and community partnerships.

-Long-term management and durability planning.

Anaxee is building exactly this system in India.


Conclusion: Planting Trust Alongside Trees

ARR has the potential to be India’s most powerful carbon removal tool. But only if done right. The 2025 Criteria for High-Quality CDR provide the guardrails.

Anaxee ensures ARR projects are transparent, durable, and community-driven. By planting trust alongside trees, we create climate solutions that endure.


👉 Call to Action
Partner with Anaxee to build high-quality afforestation and reforestation projects in India. Together, we can restore ecosystems, empower communities, and deliver credible carbon removals. Connect with us at sales@anaxee.com

MRV in Carbon Projects: Building Trust through Digital Measurement, Reporting, and Verification

Introduction: Why MRV Is the Backbone of Carbon Markets

Every carbon credit is supposed to represent one tonne of CO₂ removed or avoided. But how do we know that tonne is real? How do we ensure it isn’t double-counted, exaggerated, or reversed?

The answer is MRV—Measurement, Reporting, and Verification. Without MRV, carbon markets collapse into greenwashing and mistrust. With MRV, they become a credible climate solution.

The 2025 Criteria for High-Quality Carbon Dioxide Removal makes MRV one of its central pillars. High-quality projects must measure transparently, report consistently, and verify independently.

In India, where projects span millions of smallholders and diverse landscapes, this is even more critical. Traditional MRV methods—paper-based surveys, occasional audits—are too slow and prone to error. What’s needed is digital MRV (dMRV): scalable, transparent, and cost-effective.

That’s where Anaxee comes in.


What Is MRV in Carbon Projects?

MRV stands for:

  1. Measurement – collecting accurate data on carbon removal or emissions reduction.

  2. Reporting – documenting and sharing the data in a standardized format.

  3. Verification – independent auditing to ensure credibility.

For example:

-In a soil carbon project, measurement involves soil sampling and remote sensing.

-Reporting involves compiling data into methodologies like Verra’s VM0047.

-Verification means third-party auditors checking data integrity.

Without these steps, credits are just promises on paper.


Why MRV Is So Challenging in India

India’s carbon opportunity is massive—but so are the MRV challenges:

-Scale: Millions of farmers across thousands of villages.

-Diversity: Crops, soils, and practices vary by region.

-Data Gaps: Smallholders often lack records or connectivity.

-Cost: Traditional MRV can eat up 30–40% of project revenues.

-Timeliness: Manual audits take months or years, delaying credits.

These challenges risk excluding smallholders or creating low-quality credits.


Digital MRV (dMRV): The Next Generation
Infographic comparing Traditional MRV and Digital MRV, with icons and a field worker illustration. Traditional MRV is shown as time-consuming, paper-based, manual, and high-cost, while Digital MRV highlights real-time data, remote sensing, and automation.

Digital MRV uses technology to make monitoring real-time, scalable, and verifiable. Tools include:

-Remote Sensing: Satellite and drone imagery for land-use tracking.

-IoT Sensors: Soil moisture, carbon flux, and weather data.

-Mobile Apps: Farmer surveys, geotagged photos, and activity logs.

-AI & Machine Learning: Pattern recognition for crop and forest growth.

-Blockchain: Immutable reporting and transparent registries.

Together, these make MRV faster, cheaper, and more credible.


Why MRV Is a Pillar of High-Quality Carbon Removal

The 2025 Criteria for High-Quality CDR stress MRV for three reasons:

  1. Integrity – ensuring every claimed tonne is real.

  2. Transparency – buyers, auditors, and communities see the same data.

  3. Durability – tracking projects over decades to prevent reversals.

MRV isn’t just a technical box to tick—it’s what separates a market built on trust from one riddled with greenwashing.


Anaxee’s dMRV: Tech-Enabled Trust at Scale
Infographic listing benefits of digital MRV such as lower costs, speed, scalability, transparency, and community inclusion, alongside challenges like data gaps, lack of standardization, access issues, trust in technology, and high setup costs.

Anaxee has built a digital MRV ecosystem designed for India’s unique challenges:

1. Last-Mile Data Collection

-40,000+ Digital Runners gather on-ground data—tree survival, soil practices, farmer feedback.

-Mobile apps ensure geotagging, timestamping, and instant uploads.

2. Remote Sensing + AI

-Satellite imagery tracks land-use change and vegetation growth.

-AI models estimate biomass and soil carbon across landscapes.

3. Transparent Dashboards

-Real-time dashboards show project progress for farmers, corporates, and auditors.

-Buyers see live evidence, not just static reports.

4. Independent Verification

-Data is structured to meet global standards (Verra, Gold Standard, ISO).

-Third-party verifiers access transparent datasets for audits.

5. Cost Efficiency

-dMRV reduces MRV costs from 30–40% down to 10–15%.

-This means more carbon finance flows directly to farmers.


The Risks of Weak MRV

Without strong MRV, projects risk:

-Over-crediting: claiming more tonnes than removed.

-Double-counting: two entities claiming the same tonne.

-Leakage blindness: ignoring displacement effects.

-Reversal blind spots: missing when carbon is re-released.

Weak MRV undermines market trust. Buyers walk away, farmers lose out, and the climate suffers.


India’s Opportunity: Becoming a Hub for Transparent Credits

If India can solve MRV at scale, it can become the world’s hub for credible NbS credits. Global buyers increasingly demand transparency: Microsoft, Stripe, and Frontier all require rigorous MRV.

With dMRV, India can:

-Unlock farmer participation.

-Build buyer confidence.

-Reduce project costs.

-Position itself as a global leader in carbon credit quality.


Case Example: Bund Plantations + dMRV

In Anaxee’s bund plantation projects in Madhya Pradesh:

-Digital Runners record tree planting with geotagged photos.

-Satellites confirm survival and growth.

-AI models estimate biomass accumulation.

-Dashboards show transparent progress to buyers.

The result: credits that are traceable, auditable, and trusted.


Future of MRV: Beyond Compliance

MRV will evolve from being a compliance burden to a value creator:

-Farmers can use data for better crop management.

-Corporates gain brand trust through transparent offsets.

-Communities build resilience through shared monitoring.

Anaxee’s Climate Command Centre is already pioneering this future—linking MRV with community development, financial flows, and SDG impacts.


Conclusion: MRV as the Engine of Trust

Carbon markets live or die by trust. MRV is the engine of that trust. Without it, credits are empty promises. With it, credits become real climate action.

The 2025 Criteria for High-Quality CDR made this clear. For India, the challenge is scale and credibility. Anaxee’s dMRV shows how to bridge that gap—combining last-mile reach, digital tools, and transparent systems.

The future of carbon removal will be digital, transparent, and community-driven. Anaxee is already building it.


Partner with Anaxee to deploy scalable, transparent dMRV solutions in India’s carbon projects. Let’s build trust, credibility, and impact together.

About Anaxee:

 Anaxee drives/develops large-scale, country-wide Climate and Carbon Credit projects across India. We specialize in Nature-Based Solutions (NbS) and community-driven initiatives, providing the technology and on-ground network needed to execute, monitor, and ensure transparency in projects like agroforestry, regenerative agriculture, improved cookstoves, solar devices, water filters and more. Our systems are designed to maintain integrity and verifiable impact in carbon methodologies.

Beyond climate, Anaxee is India’s Reach Engine- building the nation’s largest last-mile outreach network of 100,000 Digital Runners (shared, tech-enabled field force). We help corporates, agri-focused companies, and social organizations scale to rural and semi-urban India by executing projects in 26 states, 540+ districts, and 11,000+ pin codes, ensuring both scale and 100% transparency in last-mile operations. Connect with Anaxee at sales@anaxee.com 

An Anaxee field worker photographs a ground-mounted solar panel array in a lush farm, documenting a solar-agriculture pilot in rural India.

Soil Carbon Projects in India: Pathways for High-Quality Carbon Removal with Anaxee

Introduction: The Carbon Beneath Our Feet

When we talk about climate solutions, the focus often goes to trees, solar panels, or electric vehicles. But there’s a silent climate ally right beneath us: soil.

Globally, soils store more carbon than the atmosphere and vegetation combined. Healthy soils are not just the backbone of agriculture; they are also a massive carbon sink. By adopting the right practices, farmers can draw down atmospheric carbon into soils—locking it away while boosting fertility, water retention, and resilience.

The 2025 Criteria for High-Quality CDR recognizes soil carbon as a key pathway, but with important caveats: measurement, durability, and community justice are critical.

For India—a country with over 150 million smallholder farmers—soil carbon is not just about climate. It’s about livelihoods, food security, and creating a new income stream through carbon finance.


What Is Soil Carbon Removal?
Infographic titled “What is Soil Carbon?” listing regenerative agriculture, agroforestry, organic soil amendments, and pasture management, with Anaxee branding.

Soil carbon removal involves changing land management practices so that more carbon is stored in soils. This can be achieved through:

-Regenerative agriculture – practices like cover cropping, crop rotation, reduced tillage.

-Agroforestry – integrating trees into farmland.

-Organic soil amendments – compost, biochar, or enhanced rock weathering.

-Pasture management – rotational grazing that enhances soil cover.

These changes help soils absorb and retain more organic carbon, turning farms into climate-positive landscapes.


Why Soil Carbon Matters for India

1. Agriculture Is Both Vulnerable and Powerful

Agriculture contributes to India’s emissions (methane, nitrous oxide), but it is also extremely vulnerable to climate change. Soil carbon projects can reverse degradation, improve yields, and build resilience.

2. Rural Livelihoods

Most Indian farmers operate on marginal lands with tight incomes. Soil carbon credits offer new revenue streams through global carbon markets—helping farmers while fighting climate change.

3. Scale

With millions of hectares of farmland, even modest improvements in soil carbon storage can translate into gigatonne-scale removals.


What Makes a High-Quality Soil Carbon Project?

According to the 2025 Criteria, soil carbon projects must meet strict benchmarks:

1. Social and Environmental Justice

-Ensure farmers are not locked into harmful contracts.

-Guarantee fair benefit-sharing from carbon revenues.

-Protect communities from risks like rising input costs.

2. Environmental Integrity

-Avoid overuse of fertilizers or chemicals that harm ecosystems.

-Promote biodiversity, soil health, and water retention.

3. Additionality and Baselines

-Show that soil practices would not have been adopted without carbon finance.

-Set conservative baselines that account for natural regeneration.

4. MRV (Measurement, Reporting, Verification)

-Use peer-reviewed models and direct sampling.

-Monitor soil carbon changes with scientific rigor.

-Combine field sampling with remote sensing for accuracy.

5. Durability

-Soil carbon is reversible—droughts, floods, or practice abandonment can release carbon. Projects must plan for long-term adoption and risk mitigation.

6. Leakage

-Prevent displacement of practices—e.g., if reduced tillage here leads to over-tillage elsewhere.


The Challenges in Soil Carbon

Soil carbon is powerful but tricky:

-Measurement Uncertainty – detecting small year-to-year changes is scientifically challenging.

-Permanence Risks – carbon can be re-released if practices stop.

-Farmer Adoption – smallholders may hesitate without upfront support.

-Market Trust – buyers worry about inflated or unverifiable credits.

This is why soil carbon must be implemented with robust MRV, long-term planning, and community-first approaches.


Anaxee’s Approach to Soil Carbon in India

Anaxee is working to make soil carbon projects credible, scalable, and farmer-friendly. Here’s how:

1. Farmer-Centric Model
Infographic titled “Benefits for Farmers” showing icons for additional income, improved land productivity, knowledge and support, and climate resilience, with Anaxee branding.

-Farmers are partners, not just participants.

-We ensure clear contracts and transparent revenue sharing.

-We provide training in regenerative practices so benefits last beyond credits.

2. Digital MRV

-Our dMRV system combines:

  • Soil sampling protocols.

  • Remote sensing and satellite data.

  • Mobile-based farmer reporting (via Digital Runners).


  • Infographic explaining the dMRV Process—Digital Measurement, Reporting, and Verification—showing steps with icons for measurement, reporting, and verification, branded with Anaxee.

    -This ensures every tonne of soil carbon is traceable and verifiable.

3. Risk Mitigation

-Long-term engagement: multi-year contracts to prevent reversals.

-Blended portfolios: combining soil projects with agroforestry for durability.

-Early warning systems for risks like droughts.

4. Scale and Reach

-With 40,000+ Digital Runners across 26 states, we can engage farmers at scale.

-From Bund plantations in central India to regenerative farming in Punjab, Anaxee ensures projects are grounded in local context.


Soil Carbon and Global Carbon Markets

Buyers like Microsoft, Stripe, and Frontier are seeking high-quality removals—not just offsets. Soil carbon, if implemented well, can meet this demand.

However, buyers demand:

-Transparency in MRV.

-Durability guarantees.

-Clear community benefits.

By embedding the 2025 Criteria, Anaxee ensures Indian soil carbon projects meet global expectations while delivering local impact.


Case Example: Bund Plantations with Soil Benefits

In Madhya Pradesh, Anaxee has been implementing bund plantations (tree planting along farm bunds). These projects not only sequester carbon in trees but also:

-Reduce soil erosion.

-Improve water retention.

-Enhance soil organic matter.

Farmers see higher yields, lower risks, and additional carbon revenue—a model that aligns with soil carbon criteria while benefiting communities.


India’s Role in Scaling Soil Carbon

Globally, soil carbon is seen as one of the most scalable and affordable CDR solutions. For India:

-The sheer scale of agriculture makes it a climate opportunity.

-Programs like National Mission for Sustainable Agriculture can align with soil carbon.

-Carbon finance can create new rural economies.

The challenge is ensuring projects are high-quality, transparent, and durable. That’s the gap Anaxee fills.


Conclusion: Soil Carbon as India’s Climate and Rural Opportunity

Soil carbon is more than a climate tool—it’s a bridge between global carbon markets and local livelihoods. Done right, it improves soils, strengthens food systems, and rewards farmers while delivering credible removals.

But the “done right” is key. Without robust MRV, durability, and justice, soil carbon risks becoming another failed promise. With frameworks like the 2025 Criteria for High-Quality CDR, we now have the roadmap.

Anaxee is bringing that roadmap to life in India—combining tech, trust, and last-mile execution to ensure soil carbon projects are globally credible and locally transformative.

The future of climate action lies beneath our feet. It’s time we nurture it.


👉 Call to Action
Partner with Anaxee to unlock India’s soil carbon potential. Together, we can build credible, farmer-first, and globally trusted carbon projects.

About Anaxee:

 Anaxee drives/develops large-scale, country-wide Climate and Carbon Credit projects across India. We specialize in Nature-Based Solutions (NbS) and community-driven initiatives, providing the technology and on-ground network needed to execute, monitor, and ensure transparency in projects like agroforestry, regenerative agriculture, improved cookstoves, solar devices, water filters and more. Our systems are designed to maintain integrity and verifiable impact in carbon methodologies.

Beyond climate, Anaxee is India’s Reach Engine- building the nation’s largest last-mile outreach network of 100,000 Digital Runners (shared, tech-enabled field force). We help corporates, agri-focused companies, and social organizations scale to rural and semi-urban India by executing projects in 26 states, 540+ districts, and 11,000+ pin codes, ensuring both scale and 100% transparency in last-mile operations. Connect with Anaxee at sales@anaxee.com 

Anaxee: Redefining CSR and Carbon Projects with Tech-Enabled Transparency

Introduction: Why CSR Needs a New Model

India has emerged as a global pioneer in Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) by making it mandatory under the Companies Act, 2013. Each year, thousands of crores flow into CSR initiatives, touching lives across education, health, livelihood, environment, and community development.

But when it comes to climate and carbon-linked CSR projects, the picture is less inspiring. While companies are increasingly allocating funds to environmental projects, questions persist:

-Are CSR funds truly creating measurable climate impact?

-Do corporates have real-time visibility into how projects are performing?

-Are NGOs empowered enough to implement long-term, carbon-accounted projects?

The reality is stark. Most CSR projects struggle with short-term focus, dependency on NGOs with limited resources, and lack of robust monitoring systems. As a result, transparency and credibility—the two pillars of impactful climate action—are often missing.

This is where Anaxee Digital Runners Pvt. Ltd. is changing the narrative. Positioned at the intersection of tech, community reach, and climate action, Anaxee offers a new model of CSR execution—one that makes climate projects transparent, scalable, and accountable.


The Shift: From Welfare CSR to Climate CSR

Infographic showing the CSR shift towards environmental sustainability with icons for people, trees, and renewable energy.

Traditionally, CSR in India has been focused on welfare projects—schools, hospitals, skill training, community services. These are important, but with the mounting urgency of the climate crisis, the corporate focus is shifting.

-Companies are expected to go beyond welfare and invest in sustainability.

-Climate-linked CSR is becoming part of ESG reporting and net-zero commitments.

-Regulators and stakeholders are pushing for measurable outcomes—not just good intentions.

Yet, many corporates face a gap. They want to invest CSR money into climate projects but lack credible, transparent partners who can bridge the gap between corporate boardrooms and rural landscapes where these projects take root.

Anaxee fills this gap.


Anaxee’s Unique Position in the CSR-Climate Space

Infographic showing Anaxee’s unique edge with icons for Pan-India Network, Tech Integration, Local Expertise, and Measurable Impact.

Anaxee is not just another implementation partner. It is a tech-enabled climate execution engine with unmatched last-mile reach across India.

Here’s what sets Anaxee apart:

  1. Nationwide Reach

    • With a network of 40,000+ Digital Runners, Anaxee has the capacity to execute projects in remote villages, tribal areas, and Tier-3 towns—where climate action truly matters.

    • This grassroots presence ensures authentic community engagement and trusted local participation.

  2. Tech-Driven Execution

    • Anaxee integrates digital monitoring, reporting, and verification (dMRV) tools into every CSR project.

    • Real-time dashboards give corporates visibility into where their funds are going and what impact is being created.

  3. Proven Track Record

    • From Clean cooking initiatives to agroforestry bund plantations under VM0047, Anaxee has delivered climate impact with social co-benefits.

    • Unlike NGOs struggling with scale, Anaxee can run multiple large-scale projects simultaneously.

  4. Bridging NGO Gaps

    • NGOs bring local trust and mobilization power, but lack tech, carbon expertise, and roadmaps.

    • Anaxee empowers NGOs with technology, training, and transparent processes—making them more effective partners.

In short, Anaxee is the missing link between corporate CSR funds, NGOs, and transparent carbon outcomes.


Bringing Transparency with Tech

Infographic of Anaxee’s tech-driven transparency with dashboard illustration and icons for dMRV, GIS, AI, and Satellite Monitoring.

The biggest challenge in CSR is trust. Companies often struggle to prove that:

-CSR funds were used as intended.

-The claimed impact is real and measurable.

-The benefits go beyond tokenism to long-term climate goals.

Anaxee addresses this through technology.

1. dMRV Tools for CSR and Carbon Projects

-Digital data collection through mobile apps.

-Geo-tagged photos, videos, and records.

-Automated carbon accounting integrated with project data.

2. Real-Time Dashboards for Corporates

-Corporates can log in and see project progress in real-time.

-Metrics like trees planted, survival rates, carbon sequestered, households impacted are visible at a click.

3. GIS and Satellite Integration

-Projects are cross-verified with remote sensing data.

-This eliminates false claims and ensures verifiable impact.

4. AI-Powered Monitoring

-Predictive analytics help corporates understand long-term project impact.

-Issues like sapling survival, resource gaps, or community participation can be addressed proactively.

This tech backbone makes Anaxee’s CSR projects auditable, transparent, and investor-grade.


Empowering NGOs Through Capacity Building

NGOs remain critical in India’s climate story. They are the ones who connect with communities, mobilize local participation, and create awareness. But they face limitations:

-Limited resources and manpower.

-Minimal exposure to carbon methodologies like VM0047.

-No 15–20-year roadmap planning.

-Lack of tech-enabled monitoring.

Anaxee doesn’t bypass NGOs—it empowers them.

-Training programs on climate project implementation.

-Digital tools to record and report their activities.

-Capacity building for long-term planning.

-Integration into carbon markets where NGOs couldn’t participate alone.

By partnering with Anaxee, NGOs are strengthened, not sidelined. They continue to bring local trust while Anaxee ensures transparency and scalability.


Case Examples: Anaxee in Action

1. Clean Cooking Initiatives (CSR + Climate + Health)

-Objective: Distribute clean cooking stoves in tribal communities.

-Impact:

  • Clean Cooking Initiative
    • 70% reduction in smoke-related health issues.

    • 50% less firewood consumption, reducing deforestation.

    • Community awareness on health + climate benefits.

This project showcases how Anaxee combines CSR with measurable carbon benefits.

2. Bund Agroforestry under VM0047
Drone based Tree Counting Agroforestry in India

-Integrated into carbon credit methodology.

-Smallholder farmers supported to plant trees on bunds.

-Corporate CSR funds channeled into long-term climate impact.

This project not only creates carbon credits but also delivers co-benefits like farmer income, soil health, and biodiversity.

3. Education + Climate Pilots

Group of school children in rural India holding colorful drawings during Anaxee’s Project Unnat chulha abhihyan awareness campaign, with a banner about clean cooking solutions displayed behind them.

-Combining school-level awareness programs with tree plantations.

-Creating a generation of climate-conscious youth.

These examples prove Anaxee’s ability to merge CSR, carbon, and community seamlessly.


How Corporates Benefit by Partnering with Anaxee
Graphic showing benefits for corporates partnering with Anaxee, including verified impact, carbon credits, ESG reputation, and co-benefits.

Corporates often hesitate to enter climate-linked CSR because of integrity risks. With Anaxee, they gain:

  1. Transparent Fund Utilization

    • Every rupee is traceable.

    • Corporates see exactly where and how their money is spent.

  2. Measurable Climate Impact

    • Verified metrics: CO₂ reduced, hectares restored, households impacted.

    • Projects aligned with SDGs and ESG frameworks.

  3. Enhanced Reputation

    • Corporates can communicate authentic stories to stakeholders.

    • Builds credibility with investors, regulators, and customers.

  4. Carbon Credit Potential

    • CSR funds can unlock long-term carbon credits for corporates.

    • This positions them ahead of compliance requirements like India’s Carbon Credit Trading Scheme (CCTS).


Long-Term Vision: Anaxee as India’s Climate Execution Engine

Roadmap infographic highlighting Anaxee’s long-term vision as India’s Climate Execution Engine with milestones for 2030, 2050, and 2070.

Anaxee is not solving for one CSR cycle. It is building the execution backbone for India’s climate action.

-Scaling CSR into carbon markets: Turning CSR spends into verified carbon assets.

-Aligning with India’s Net Zero 2070: Supporting corporates in meeting national targets.

-Global recognition: Positioning Indian CSR projects as credible contributors in the voluntary carbon market.

With its blend of tech, grassroots execution, and NGO empowerment, Anaxee is uniquely placed to become India’s climate execution engine.


Conclusion: Partner with Anaxee for Transparent CSR Climate Projects

The future of CSR is climate-linked, transparent, and accountable. Corporates can no longer afford token projects—they need real impact backed by data.

NGOs alone cannot ensure this. Corporates alone cannot reach villages. But with Anaxee, CSR funds can:

-Empower NGOs.

-Deliver measurable climate outcomes.

-Align with ESG and net-zero goals.

-Build credibility in carbon markets.

Anaxee is where CSR meets transparency, where technology meets community, and where corporates meet climate action.


About Anaxee:
Anaxee drives large-scale, country-wide Climate and Carbon Credit projects across India. We specialize in Nature-Based Solutions (NbS) and community-driven initiatives, providing the technology and on-ground network needed to execute, monitor, and ensure transparency in projects like agroforestry, regenerative agriculture, improved cookstoves, solar devices, water filters and more. Our systems are designed to maintain integrity and verifiable impact in carbon methodologies.

Beyond climate, Anaxee is India’s Reach Engine- building the nation’s largest last-mile outreach network of 100,000 Digital Runners (shared, tech-enabled field force). We help corporates, agri-focused companies, and social organizations scale to rural and semi-urban India by executing projects in 26 states, 540+ districts, and 11,000+ pin codes, ensuring both scale and 100% transparency in last-mile operations. Connect with Anaxee at sales@anaxee.com


 

A Buyer’s Guide to Biochar Carbon Credits: Making Smarter Choices

Introduction: Why Biochar Carbon Credits Are in the Spotlight

If you are a company, investor, or sustainability officer thinking about how to reach net zero, you’ve probably come across the term biochar carbon credits. Biochar projects are attracting attention because they combine two powerful benefits: durable carbon removal and co-benefits for soil, agriculture, and local communities.

Unlike many traditional offsets that simply avoid emissions, biochar locks carbon into a stable form for hundreds of years through pyrolysis. The resulting carbon is stored in solid form, often used to improve soil fertility or even replace polluting products.

But here’s the catch: not all biochar projects are the same. The voluntary carbon market is still evolving, and buyers often face challenges like inconsistent quality, limited supply, and complex risk factors. Making the right decision requires a framework — and that’s where CEEZER’s 5-step approach comes in handy.

Infographic showing CEEZER’s 5-step framework for biochar carbon credit procurement: define priorities, select project characteristics, build portfolio, optimize procurement, and leverage technology, displayed over a background of biochar pieces.

In this guide, we’ll walk you through:

  1. Defining your priorities as a carbon credit buyer

  2. Selecting project characteristics that fit your goals

  3. Building a diversified biochar portfolio

  4. Optimizing your procurement strategy

  5. Leveraging technology for transparency and impact

By the end, you’ll have a roadmap to buy biochar carbon credits with confidence, while ensuring your investments align with long-term carbon credit procurement strategy and net zero commitments.


Step 1: Define Your Priorities

Every company has unique sustainability goals. Before you start scouting projects, pause and ask: What does success look like for your organization?

Possible Buyer Priorities:

-Durability of Removal: Is your priority long-term storage (100+ years)? Biochar offers strong permanence compared to nature-based solutions like afforestation.

-Scalability: Do you need large volumes now, or are you comfortable with smaller, growing projects that can scale over time?

-Co-Benefits: Do you want your credits to also support farmers, rural employment, or degraded land restoration?

-Cost Efficiency: Are you under pressure to optimize budgets and buy affordable credits, or do you want to invest in premium, high-integrity projects?

-Geographic Relevance: Do you want local projects (for community storytelling) or global sourcing for better supply diversification?

👉 Example: A food and beverage company sourcing crops from India might prioritize biochar credits generated locally, since they directly improve farmer livelihoods and soil quality in the supply chain.


Step 2: Select the Right Project Characteristics

Not all biochar projects are created equal. Once your priorities are clear, evaluate project characteristics.

Key Factors to Assess:
  1. Feedstock Type

    -Agricultural residues, forestry waste, or urban biomass.

    -Risk: Unsustainable sourcing could undermine climate impact.

  2. Pyrolysis Technology

    -Small-scale kilns vs. industrial units.

    -Advanced units improve carbon yield and reduce methane leaks.

  3. Carbon Removal Permanence

    -Biochar generally locks carbon for 100–1000 years.

    -Check certification standards like Puro.earth or Verra for validation.

  4. Co-Benefits

    -Soil health, crop productivity, reduced fertilizer use.

    -Community jobs and local entrepreneurship.

  5. Verification & Certification

    -Choose projects with third-party MRV (Monitoring, Reporting, Verification).

    -Certification ensures credibility.


Step 3: Build a Diversified Biochar Portfolio

Just like financial investments, diversification reduces risk. Instead of relying on a single project, build a portfolio that balances cost, risk, and impact.

Why Diversification Matters:

-Supply risks: Projects may under-deliver on promised volumes.

-Technology risks: Early-stage pyrolysis units may face breakdowns.

-Market risks: Prices fluctuate as supply-demand evolves.

Portfolio Approach:

-Mix of geographies: India, Africa, Europe.

-Mix of project sizes: Established industrial plants + emerging farmer-led models.

-Mix of co-benefits: Some focused on soil, others on renewable energy co-products.

👉 Example Portfolio:

-40% credits from large-scale European biochar producers (high certainty).

-40% from farmer-led Indian agroforestry biochar projects (community co-benefits).

-20% from experimental urban biomass-to-biochar pilots (innovation exposure).


Step 4: Optimize Your Procurement Strategy

Now that you know what to buy, it’s time to think about how you buy. Procurement strategies can make or break your impact.

Approaches to Procurement:

  1. Spot Buying

    -One-off purchase when credits are available.

    -Pros: Flexibility.

    -Cons: Higher prices, supply uncertainty.

  2. Forward Contracts

    -Buy credits from future vintages (1–5 years ahead).

    – Pros: Price security, supports project financing.

    – Cons: Delivery risks.

  3. Blended Procurement

    – Mix spot and forward to balance risks.

  4. Partnerships & Direct Investments

    -Collaborate with project developers.

    – Secure long-term supply and shape project design.

👉 Tip: Many buyers combine 30–40% spot purchases with forward agreements for stability.


Step 5: Leverage Technology for Transparency and Impact

One of the biggest challenges in carbon markets is trust. Buyers want to know:

-Are the credits real?

-Is the carbon truly stored?

-Are communities benefiting?

This is where technology-driven MRV becomes essential.

How Tech Helps in Biochar Projects:

-Geo-tagging: Each biochar application site can be mapped.

-Digital Runners & Field Data Collection: Platforms like Anaxee ensure on-ground monitoring at scale.

-Satellite Imagery: Verifies land use change and soil impact.

-Blockchain or Registry Tech: Tracks credits transparently to prevent double-counting.


Managing Risks in Biochar Carbon Credits

No guide is complete without risk management. Buyers should be aware of:

-Permanence Risk: Though durable, improper application/storage could degrade biochar.

-Methodology Risk: Inconsistent standards across registries.

-Market Risk: Price volatility as biochar supply scales.

-Delivery Risk: Small projects may fail to deliver promised volumes.

👉 Mitigation Tip: Diversify, choose verified projects, and maintain ongoing monitoring.


Conclusion: Smarter Choices for Net Zero

Buying biochar carbon credits is not just a compliance move — it’s a strategic decision that can:

-Lock away carbon for centuries

-Improve soil health and agricultural resilience

-Support rural livelihoods

-Strengthen your net zero strategy

By following CEEZER’s 5-step framework — define priorities, select project characteristics, diversify your portfolio, optimize procurement, and leverage technology — buyers can make informed, resilient, and impactful choices.

As demand for high-quality carbon removals grows, those who build smart procurement strategies today will lead the way tomorrow.


About Anaxee:

Anaxee drives large-scale, country-wide Climate and Carbon Credit projects across India. We specialize in Nature-Based Solutions (NbS) and community-driven initiatives, providing the technology and on-ground network needed to execute, monitor, and ensure transparency in projects like agroforestry, regenerative agriculture, improved cookstoves, solar devices, water filters and more. Our systems are designed to maintain integrity and verifiable impact in carbon methodologies.

Person feeding agricultural residues into a pyrolysis unit for biochar production in an outdoor field setup.

Beyond climate, Anaxee is India’s Reach Engine- building the nation’s largest last-mile outreach network of 100,000 Digital Runners (shared, tech-enabled field force). We help corporates, agri-focused companies, and social organizations scale to rural and semi-urban India by executing projects in 26 states, 540+ districts, and 11,000+ pin codes, ensuring both scale and 100% transparency in last-mile operations.

Partner with Anaxee for your Net ZERO goals! Connect at sales@anaxee.com

Risks in Biochar Projects and How to Manage Them

Risks in Biochar Projects and How to Manage Them

Introduction

The global carbon market is placing increasing trust in biochar as one of the most promising tools for carbon dioxide removal (CDR). In 2023–2024, biochar accounted for more than 90% of all durable carbon removal deliveries in the voluntary carbon market.

But like any climate solution, biochar is not without risks. Critics often ask: Is the carbon really locked away? What if projects exaggerate? Can small kilns in rural areas be trusted to deliver verified credits?

These are important questions. A strong carbon market needs credibility, transparency, and risk management. This blog explores the main risks in biochar projects — and how innovators, developers, and standards are addressing them.


1. Non-Additionality Risk

What it means:
For a project to generate carbon credits, it must prove that it would not have happened without carbon finance. If the activity is “business as usual,” then credits are not additional.

How it applies to biochar:

-If a farmer already makes biochar for soil improvement without carbon finance, issuing credits for the same activity risks double counting.

-Large industrial biomass users might switch to biochar anyway due to regulation or cost advantages, raising questions about additionality.

How to manage:

-Rely on clear baseline studies to show the biomass would have otherwise decomposed or been burned.

-Require third-party verification at project registration.

-Standards like Verra VM0044 and Puro.earth mandate strict baseline documentation.


2. Reversal Risk

What it means:
Carbon stored today could be released tomorrow. In forestry projects, this often happens when trees burn or are cut down.

Why biochar is stronger:
Biochar is much more chemically stable than biomass. Its carbon structures resist microbial decay, with lifespans of hundreds to thousands of years.

But risks still exist:

-Poorly made biochar (low pyrolysis temperatures, high volatile matter) may degrade faster.

-Fire in storage sites could destroy stockpiled biochar before application.

-Incorrect use in soils may reduce permanence.

How to manage:

-Follow strict pyrolysis quality guidelines (high-temperature production).

-Apply biochar quickly to soils or construction materials instead of stockpiling.

-Conduct lab tests on stability indicators like the H/C ratio.

-Use buffer pools (extra credits held in reserve) as insurance.


3. Over-Crediting Risk

What it means:
Projects may issue more credits than the actual carbon removed.

Causes in biochar:

-Misreporting feedstock origin (using biomass that would not have released CO₂ anyway).

-Inflated assumptions about carbon stability.

-Errors in mass-balance calculations of biomass in vs. biochar out.

How to manage:

-Registries require conservative factors in calculations.

-Third-party auditors must validate data before credits are issued.

-Digital MRV tools (like Planboo’s mobile MRV) ensure field-level traceability.


4. Leakage Risk

What it means:
A project reduces emissions in one place but causes an increase elsewhere.

Examples in biochar:

-Diverting crop residues from animal fodder to pyrolysis could force farmers to use alternative feed with its own emissions.

-Using wood that would otherwise have been used in local industries.

How to manage:

-Allow only true waste biomass as feedstock.

-Conduct surveys of local uses of residues.

-Require projects to show that no alternative market is disrupted.


5. Negative Social or Environmental Impacts

Concerns:

-Low-tech kilns may release methane or smoke, harming local air quality.

-If biochar demand drives biomass plantations, it could compete with food or forests.

-Communities may not benefit if projects are highly centralized.

Solutions:

-Train operators in clean pyrolysis techniques.

-Adopt artisanal methodologies (like CSI Artisan) that focus on smallholder inclusion.

-Monitor co-benefits: jobs created, crop yield increases, gender participation.

Case Study:

-Varaha and IIT Bombay studied methane risks in poorly run pyrolysis. Findings led to improved kiln design.

-Carboneers in Ghana provide 500% income boosts for women by involving them in small-scale biochar projects.


6. Delivery Risk

What it means:
The project promises credits but fails to deliver on time.

Why it happens:

-Feedstock shortages due to crop failure.

-Technical problems in reactors.

-Over-ambitious targets.

How to manage:

-Diversify feedstock sources.

-Use modular reactors for flexibility.

-Sign smaller offtake contracts at the start, then scale.

-Build partnerships with farmer networks (like Anaxee’s Digital Runner network) for reliable biomass supply.


7. Reputation and Market Risks

Concerns:

-Negative media coverage about “low-quality credits” can affect all biochar projects, even good ones.

-Buyers are cautious after controversies in REDD+ and cookstove credits.

Solutions:

-Radical transparency in project reporting.

-Use digital dashboards for buyers to track biochar production in near real-time.

-Third-party endorsements from scientific bodies.


8. How Standards and Innovation Reduce Risks

The good news is that biochar risks are manageable — and are already being managed.

-Standards (Verra, Puro, Isometric, CSI) provide strict guardrails.

-Innovation (digital MRV, blockchain tracking, IoT-enabled kilns) increases trust.

-Community-first models ensure social acceptance and equitable benefit-sharing.

Together, these approaches make biochar one of the lowest-risk removal credits compared to other methods like forestry or enhanced weathering.


Conclusion

Biochar is not risk-free, but its risks are identifiable, manageable, and often lower than other carbon removal pathways.

-Non-additionality is solved with clear baselines.

-Reversal risk is minimized through stable chemistry.

-Over-crediting is prevented by conservative methodologies.

-Leakage is reduced by strict feedstock rules.

-Delivery is secured through diversified networks.

For investors, corporates, and communities, this means biochar credits can be a trusted part of net zero strategies. The key lies in good governance, transparent MRV, and community-centered implementation.

In short: biochar projects succeed when risks are acknowledged, measured, and managed — not ignored.


About Anaxee:

Anaxee drives large-scale, country-wide Climate and Carbon Credit projects across India. We specialize in Nature-Based Solutions (NbS) and community-driven initiatives, providing the technology and on-ground network needed to execute, monitor, and ensure transparency in projects like agroforestry, regenerative agriculture, improved cookstoves, solar devices, water filters and more. Our systems are designed to maintain integrity and verifiable impact in carbon methodologies.

Beyond climate, Anaxee is India’s Reach Engine- building the nation’s largest last-mile outreach network of 100,000 Digital Runners (shared, tech-enabled field force). We help corporates, agri-focused companies, and social organizations scale to rural and semi-urban India by executing projects in 26 states, 540+ districts, and 11,000+ pin codes, ensuring both scale and 100% transparency in last-mile operations.

Biochar in hand