Cookstoves to Carbon Finance: Lessons from Rwanda & Malawi for India’s Rural Climate Project

1. A Tale of Two Kitchens-

In a hillside village near Kigali, Aisha stirs beans on a shiny metal stove. Smoke no longer burns her eyes. Meanwhile, in Madhya Pradesh’s Betul district, Sunita still cooks on an open fire that blackens her thatch roof. The difference isn’t technology alone; it is finance.

Rwanda’s project earned Article 6 authorized carbon credits, sold them to premium buyers, and used the money to scale factory jobs and distribution. Malawi followed next. India- home to 100 million biomass-dependent households can be third, bigger, and faster. This blog picks apart the African playbook and maps each lesson to the Indian reality, with Anaxee’s last-mile network as the execution engine.

Rwanda, atmosfair and Gold Standard Launch First Carbon Credit Aligned with Paris Article 6
Photo Credit- Gold Standard

2. Quick Recap: Article 6 in Kitchen-Table English

– Old days: Anyone could buy a voluntary credit, retire it, and claim “carbon neutral,” even if the host nation also counted the same reduction in its NDC.
– New days: Host governments can grant or withhold a Letter of Authorization. If granted, they promise a corresponding adjustment—so no double counting.
– Result: Buyers wanting bullet-proof claims now pay more for these authorized units. Projects that secure LOAs early win big.


3. Case Study #1: Atmosfair’s Rwanda Clean-Cooking Programme

3.1 The Production Pivot

Atmosfair first assembled stoves in Germany. Shipping costs ate margin. With projected premium revenue, they risked moving tooling to Kigali. The gamble worked: local value-add impressed the government and sped up LOA approval.

Rwanda, atmosfair and Gold Standard Launch First Carbon Credit Aligned with Paris Article 6
Photo Credit- Gold Standard

Lesson for India: Domestic manufacturing- say in Jabalpur or Guwahati- signals long-term commitment and aligns with Make-in-India goals, smoothing state-level clearances.

3.2 Data Discipline

Each Rwandan household answers periodic mobile surveys, backed by sensor data (temperature and usage). Gold Standard auditors loved the hard evidence, cutting questions about over-crediting.

Anaxee angle: Digital Runners can replicate this by embedding Bluetooth stove loggers and using the Anaxee app for survey sync.


4. Case Study #2: Hestian’s Malawi Rural Stove Network

Metric Detail
Households Reached 1.4 million since 2008
Authorization Timeline 4 months (July–Dec 2023) from first draft to LOA
Driver Buyer demand: airlines needed Article 6 units
Key Enabler Malawi Carbon Market Initiative launched by presidential decree
Verification Approach Community-based monitoring + third-party spot-checks
4.1 Trust Over Templates

Malawi lacked a formal Article 6 law, yet officials showed readiness. Hestian offered full transparency—open PDD drafts, community letters, financial projections. Trust, not bureaucracy, closed the gap.

Take-away for India: Even if national CCTS rules are pending, project developers can start dialogues today with state environment departments and the re-notified DNA.

4.2 Scale and Equitable Split

Hestian built in a share-of-proceeds mechanism: 2 % of gross revenue funds Malawi’s national cleaner-cooking roadmap. The proposal boosted political goodwill. India could mirror this by committing a slice of revenue to district health missions or women’s self-help groups- an alignment bureaucrats value.


5. Five Big Takeaways for India’s Cookstove & Agroforestry Space


6. How Anaxee Can Replicate- and Improve

  1. Hyper-granular Baseline. Digital Runners already conduct socio-economic surveys; add fuel-use metrics and GIS tags for stronger baseline accuracy.
  2. Drone Fly-overs Every Quarter. Confirm canopy growth in agroforestry corridors; footage auto-idles into IPFS (immutable ledger).
  3. Distributed Warehouse Model. 25 regional hubs store stoves/seeds, cutting logistics cost and emissions (extra SDG credit!).
  4. Immutable Ledger Sync. Sensor and drone data hashed to blockchain; auditable trail reduces verifier time and cost.
  5. Pay-per-Performance App. Household receives ₹ mobile top-ups when sensors prove daily stove usage—locks in behaviour change, slashes non-usage risk discounts.

7. Where the Money Will Come From in 2025-2028

– Airlines: Each tonne they emit above baseline must be offset; Phase 1 cap gets tighter in 2026. Authorized units are their only allowed currency.

– Singapore Inc.: DBS Bank, Temasek portfolio firms, and regulated power plants can use Article 6 credits to cover 5 % of emissions.

– EU-based Firms: Many now commit to “Beyond Value Chain Mitigation” with Article 6 alignment—think IKEA, H&M.

– Indian Corporates: New BRSR Core reporting norms push big listed companies toward verifiable, adjustment-backed tonnes for net-zero claims.


8. Frequently Asked Questions (Quick-Fire)

Q1. Does India already allow LOAs?
Draft template exists; final notification expected late 2025. Early pilots may use provisional letters via MoEFCC.

Q2. What if the government revokes the LOA?
Gold Standard rules hold back equivalent credits in an insurance pool; buyers refunded or replaced.

Q3. Are authorized credits double the price?
Current spot data shows 20–40 % uplift. As supply grows, premium may narrow but should remain >10 %.

Q4. Can agroforestry bundles qualify?
Yes, if permanence (>30 years) and leakage controls meet DNA guidelines. Anaxee’s drone monitoring helps.

Q5. Are sensors mandatory?
Not legally, but they slash uncertainty deductions and impress auditors—cheap insurance in practice.


9. Closing Call

Africa proved that even small countries with limited resources can release Article 6 authorized credits in under six months. India has bigger talent, bigger markets, and bigger climate needs. All it takes is organised data, honest partnerships, and smart field logistics—the things Anaxee does every day.

Ready to turn smoky kitchens into verifiable climate finance?
Scedule a 30 minute call with us at sales@anaxee.com Let’s cook up India’s next carbon success- one authorized credit at a time.

About Anaxee: Anaxee is India’s Reach Engine! we are building India’s largest last-mile outreach network of 100,000 Digital Runners (shared feet-on-street, tech-enabled) to help Businesses and Social Organizations scale to rural and semi-urban India, We operate in 26 states, 540+ districts, and 11,000+ pin codes in India. We Help in last-mile execution of projects for (1) Corporates, (2) Agri-focused companies, (3) Climate, and (4) Social organizations. Using technology and people on-the-ground (our Digital Runners), we help in scale and execute projects across 100s of cities and bring 100% transparency in groundwork. We also work in the Tech for Climate domain, providing technology for the execution and monitoring of Nature-Based (NbS) and Community projects. Our technology & processes bring transparency and integrity into carbon projects across various methodologies (Agroforestry, Regen Agriculture, Solar devices, Improved Cookstoves, Water filters, LED lamps, etc.) worldwide.

Taking the data of Beneficiary while Distributing the Improved Cookstove in Clean Cooking Project in India

Best GTM Strategy for Non‑FMCG Brands in India: A Data‑Driven Playbook

Best GTM Strategy for Non‑FMCG Brands

1. Why non‑FMCG distribution is broken

Durables and discretionary products- appliances, tyres, batteries, cookware, footwear-do not enjoy the pull that soap or biscuits do. Retailers seldom ask for stock proactively; distributors often cover only the low‑hanging outlets they already know. The result is lumpy sales, territory gaps and weak brand loyalty.

Top FMCG winners overcame the same geography by actively supporting distributors and driving field execution. The obvious play, therefore, is to adapt those proven levers—market coverage, retail activation and data discipline—to categories where they never existed.

2. What we can borrow from FMCG

FMCG playbooks revolve around six hard rules: generate uniform monthly sales in every district, squeeze full market potential, touch every outlet regardless of relationships or credit terms, expand into satellite towns, build district‑level brand affinity and stay visible against competing brands. Non‑FMCG brands need the same muscle—but with longer purchase cycles, higher ASPs and fragmented dealer networks, execution must be sharper and tech‑enabled.

3. A three‑step GTM framework that works

Anaxee distils the FMCG wisdom into three sequential steps:

Infographic showing Market Mapping → Retailer Profiling → Order Taking flow
  1. Market Mapping

  2. Retailer Profiling (KYR)

  3. Order Taking

Each step fixes one layer of the funnel- visibility, insight, then conversion. Below we unpack how the framework plays out on the ground and why it beats ad‑hoc distributor push.


4. Step 1 – Market Mapping: see every shop before you sell

4.1 The problem

Most brands think they’re “present” in a region once a distributor opens a few top outlets. Reality check: in East UP alone, 8 000 target shops existed across 27 districts . Without mapping, 50‑60 % of that universe stays dark.

4.2 The solution

Digital Runners comb every street with a GPS‑enabled app, tagging each store’s coordinates and category. In East UP the first five districts (Deoria, Gorakhpur, Sultanpur, Jaunpur, Prayagraj) already represented 35 % of the addressable market, forming Phase 1 of rollout . Phases 2 and 3 cover the remaining 65 %, letting brands sequence resources logically.

4.3 Why it matters

Mapping forces fact‑based territory design instead of gut feel. It also lays the benchmark for later KPIs: coverage ratio, outlet class mix, district share.


5. Step 2 – Retailer Profiling: know your retailer (KYR)

With the shop universe in hand, field teams capture SKU‑level intel: what brands the store sells, from whom it buys, credit pain‑points and monthly offtake. The KYR form inside Anaxee’s app links every data point to the store ID .

Key insights that emerge:

-True competitor spread—e.g., of 404 electronics outlets in Prayagraj, only 140 already stocked the client’s brand, leaving 264 un‑tapped prospects.

-Product width vs depth—some outlets sell induction cooktops but not mixers; others move kettles but no vacuum cleaners.

-On‑ground challenges—credit limits, service turnaround, low MOQ.

Profiling translates anecdotes into quantified opportunity.


6. Step 3 – Order Taking: convert data into revenue

Anaxee field rep reviewing order form with local hardware shopkeeper amid stocked shelves
Anaxee’s Digital Runner Taking Orders From Retailer

Instead of hiring a permanent feet‑on‑street (FOS) army, brands piggyback on Anaxee’s Digital Runners network. Runners revisit the profiled outlets, pitch missing SKUs, create orders in‑app and sync them to distributors—the “Uberisation” of order capture.

When a previously “not‑interested” retailer in Gorakhpur flipped after four visits and placed a ₹5 000 trial order, tech logs every attempt, objection and SKU mix. Over time, repeat visits grow both width (more outlets) and depth (basket size).


7. Empowering distributors rather than bypassing them

The framework keeps distributors central but augments them with visibility, verified leads and a predictable sales cadence—solving the classic “empty pipeline” Mondays and month‑end rush. A territory manager switches from chasing speculations to servicing confirmed in‑app orders. The model also defuses dependency risk: decisions rest on real‑time dashboards, not anecdotal feedback.


8. Phase‑wise roll‑out and resource optimisation

Market mapping data lets you stage execution:

-Phase 1 (top‑five districts) delivers the fastest ROI—35 % share captured first.

– Phase 2 (next 25 %) builds momentum.

-Phase 3 mops up the tail, adding resilience.

The phased plan prevents dilution of marketing budgets and ensures early success stories to motivate distributors.


9. Measuring what matters

Dashboards update daily, pushing real accountability rather than end‑quarter surprises.


10. Technology backbone that makes the model scale

Anaxee's Digital Runner holding mobile phone on his hand, taking data of retailer for a Non FMCG project.

The Anaxee Partner app:

-Geo‑tags every visit and photo‑proofs merchandising compliance.

-Runs logic‑based call cycles so no outlet is missed.

-Streams real‑time analytics down to SKU and shop level.

This data spine is why the framework stays lean—brands avoid the overhead of building their own CRM, routing or payroll stack.


11. Common pitfalls—and how to dodge them


12. The macro tailwinds you can ride

Organized retail is expected to top US $230 billion by 2030 as brands pivot to omnichannel reach. Consumer‑electronics alone is set to hit US $152 billion by 2033 at a 6.9 % CAGR. A GTM system that taps district‑level kiranas before competitors lock them gives non‑FMCG players asymmetric advantage in this expansion wave.


13. Implementation roadmap (90‑day view)

  1. Kick‑off workshop – finalise outlet universe definition and SKU hierarchy.

  2. Pilot mapping – 2 districts, 30 days, validate data schema.

  3. Scale mapping – full phase roll‑out by day 60.

  4. Live profiling – KYR on 100 % mapped outlets by day 75.

  5. Order‑taking sprint – targeted revisit cadence starts day 76; AOV tracked weekly.

  6. Distributor review – dashboard‑driven adjustments day 90.


14. The payoff

-Uniform sales every month, versus the typical spike‑and‑crash cycle.

-Reduced channel conflict—data exposes overlap and white‑space.

-Brand share‑of‑shelf expands as width (outlet count) and depth (SKU mix) improve together.

-Lower fixed cost than hiring a large proprietary salesforce. Our 50,000+ Network of Digital Runners is just a mail away.


15. Ready to deploy?

Anaxee already runs this GTM engine for multiple utensils, electric appliance, footwear and auto‑lube, tyres brands- so you don’t start from zero. Book a discovery call to see mapping dashboards for your category and region. Connect with us at sales@anaxee.com

Four Anaxee Digital Runners in branded vests walk down busy market street to map retailers

Best dMRV Partner in India for Nature‑Based Carbon Projects – Why Anaxee Digital Runners Leads the Way

If you need a partner who can measure, report and verify (MRV) your nature‑based carbon project without long delays, high cost or tricky paperwork, this guide is for you. In plain words we show why Anaxee Digital Runners is rated by many developers as the best dMRV partner in India and how its Tech for Climate tools work on the ground.

1. Why Good MRV Matters for Nature‑Based Projects

Nature‑based carbon projects like tree planting, mangrove fixing or clean cook‑stoves work in real villages, forests and coasts. They give jobs, better air and more water safety. But buyers want proof. They ask “How much CO₂ did you really remove?” If the answer is slow or unsure, they walk away.

Good MRV means:

-Trust – credits sell faster and at better price.

-Speed – payments reach villages earlier.

-Scale – small farmers can join big programs.

In short, MRV is the backbone of every climate project. Without it, even the best idea cannot grow.


2. From MRV to dMRV – What Changed?

Split infographic comparing high costs, slow processes and manual data of old MRV with lower costs, faster workflows and digital data from Anaxee dMRV.

 

Old MRV used clipboards. A surveyor came once a year, measured a few trees and wrote notes. Now we have digital MRV (dMRV). We mix satellite images, sensors and mobile apps. Data comes in almost real time, stored in the cloud, and sent to auditors by one click.

Key parts of dMRV:

  1. Measure – satellites see tree cover; IoT meters watch stove use.
  2. Report – dashboards collect the data; reports auto‑fill in right format.
  3. Verify – records sit on safe ledgers so no one can change them later.

Because of this, many registries like Verra and Gold Standard now welcome digital flows. They know it cuts error and cost.


3. Big Pain Points With Old‑Style MRV

Pain What it means in real life
High Cost
A small 500 ha project pays up to ₹45 lakh in five years just for field checks.
Long Wait Credits often take 12‑18 months to issue. Cash flow dies.
Random Error
A few sample plots stand for the whole site. One missed tree can swing numbers.
No Local Jobs Outsider survey teams fly in and out. Villagers stay out of loop.

Developers told us these pains many times. They asked for a simple, fair and fast way. That’s why Anaxee built its Tech for Climate tools.


4. How Anaxee Solves These Pain Points

Anaxee Digital Runners started in 2016 doing doorstep KYC for banks. The team saw that the same network can also collect climate data. In 2021 they launched a full dMRV service.

4.1 Local Data Heroes

Anaxee has 40,000 trained “Digital Runners.” They live in 120,000 villages. They use a simple app to send geo‑tagged photos, tree girth numbers or stove meter IDs. No travel flights needed. Cost drops.

4.2 Smart Tech, Simple App

-Satellites – daily Sentinel‑2 feeds spot land change.

-Drones – sharp pictures for baseline mapping.

-IoT Sensors – LoRa or GSM based. Runners install and maintain them.

-Cloud Dashboard – you log in, see live map, export reports.

4.3 Audit‑Ready Ledger

Every photo, pixel and sensor ping is hashed on Hyperledger Fabric. Auditors can check any time. This builds trust with buyers.

4.4 Community Income

Each Runner earns ₹30‑₹50 per task. A 2,000 ha tree project can create 5,000+ paid tasks per year. Climate cash stays in the village.


5. Inside Anaxee’s Tech for Climate Stack

Flowchart showing the five-step Anaxee Tech for Climate stack: Satellite Feeds → IoT Sensors → Runner Data → Blockchain Ledger → Live Dashboard on a teal background.
Layer Tool Simple Benefit
Eyes in Sky Sentinel‑2, PlanetScope See tree cover weekly.
Eyes on Ground Runners + drones Confirm small changes quickly.
Smart Sensors Soil moisture, cook‑stove meters, water level loggers Get real numbers, not guesses.
Brain AI models (tree species, leakage alerts) Less manual math, fewer errors.
Memory Hyperledger + IPFS Data cannot be changed after upload.
Window Web dashboard & mobile app Anyone can view, export, or share proof.

Note – You don’t need to understand all tech. Anaxee team sets it up. You focus on planting trees or saving coasts.


6. Real Stories From the Field

6.1 Farmer‑Led Agroforestry, Chhattisgarh

-Area: 3,400 ha across 62 villages.

-Trees: Teak, mango, bamboo.

-Result: Verification cost fell from ₹600/ha/year to ₹160. Credits issued in nine months, not sixteen.

6.2 Tribal Clean Cook‑Stoves, Madhya Pradesh

-Homes: 28,000. Sensors track LPG use.

-CO₂ Saved: 46,000 tCO₂e each year.

-Local Impact: Runner tasks give ₹47 lakh extra income to youth per year.

6.3 Mangrove Revival, Odisha Coast

-Area: 1,900 ha degraded zone.

-Tech: SAR radar spots young mangrove regrowth even in clouds.

-Outcome: First batch 22,500 credits sold at USD 11/tCO₂e within 11 months.

Developers say the key was fast, clear proof that buyers could trust.


7. Cost & Time Comparison

Step Old MRV (avg) Anaxee dMRV
Baseline survey 6‑8 weeks 10 days
Monitoring visits/year 2 Live 24/7 feed + 1 visit
Report drafting 3 weeks Auto in 3 days
Verifier review 90 days 30 days
Total cost 5 year ₹45–50 lakh ₹14–18 lakh

That is a saving of up to 65 % and time cut almost by half.


8. Frequently Asked Questions

Q1. Can Anaxee work outside India?
Yes. Pilot teams run in Kenya and Brazil. Core tech is same.

Q2. How do I plug my own sensor brand?
Anaxee supports open MQTT/HTTP. Your vendor just shares the token.

Q3. Is the data private?
Yes. Personal info is hashed. Only project totals show to buyers.

Q4. What registry can I use?
Verra, Gold Standard, EcoRegistry and more. Reports follow their CSV/JSON spec.

Q5. Do I need to train the Runners?
No. Anaxee trains them with local videos and tests.


9. Next Steps to Start With Anaxee

  1. Book a free call – email sales@anaxee.com
  2. Share project map – send shapefile or KML. Team gives quick cost and time plan.
  3. Kick‑off visit – local manager meets farmers, installs first sensors.
  4. See data live – within two weeks you can log in and watch your forest grow.

No long lock‑in. Pay as you verify.


10. Final Words

Picking the right dMRV partner is like picking a heart for your project. It must beat non‑stop, stay honest and cost little. Anaxee Digital Runners does that for hundreds of nature‑based projects across India. With a mix of Tech for Climate tools and a huge village network, they make carbon proof simple, fast and fair.

So next time you search DMRV in India or best dMRV partner, remember this name – Anaxee. Your trees, stoves and mangroves will thank you, and so will the planet.

About Anaxee:

Anaxee is India’s Reach Engine! we are building India’s largest last-mile outreach network of 100,000 Digital Runners (shared feet-on-street, tech-enabled) to help Businesses and Social Organizations scale to rural and semi-urban India, We operate in 26 states, 540+ districts, and 11,000+ pin codes in India.
We Help in last-mile execution of projects for (1) Corporates, (2) Agri-focused companies, (3) Climate, and (4) Social organizations. Using technology and people on-the-ground (our Digital Runners), we help in scale and execute projects across 100s of cities and bring 100% transparency in groundwork. We also work in the Tech for Climate domain, providing technology for the execution and monitoring of Nature-Based (NbS) and Community projects. Our technology & processes bring transparency and integrity into carbon projects across various methodologies (Agroforestry, Regen Agriculture, Solar devices, Improved Cookstoves, Water filters, LED lamps, etc.) worldwide.

For More info or query, Connect with sales@anaxee.com

Anaxee representative capturing mobile data in a dense eucalyptus plantation, reflecting biodiversity and ecosystem restoration efforts aligned with nature-based carbon solutions.

 

Building Trust at Scale: Anaxee’s Digital MRV Playbook for High-Integrity Carbon Credits

Carbon markets face a credibility crunch. Manual MRV is slow, costly and prone to error. Digital MRV (dMRV) promises transparent, near‑real‑time proof of impact—yet many solutions lack on‑ground validation at scale. Anaxee Digital Runners bridges this gap with a 40,000‑member field force synced to an AI‑driven data cloud, slashing verification costs by up to 70 % while empowering smallholders across 120,000 Indian villages.

 

1  The Trust Deficit in Carbon Markets

By 2025 the voluntary carbon market (VCM) surpassed USD 2.1 billion in annual value. Yet credibility lags. A 2024 Guardian investigation found that nearly 30 % of issued credits showed overstated impact or dubious baselines. Corporations—fearful of greenwashing headlines—now demand bulletproof data trails.

Traditional MRV, built on sporadic field visits and manual paperwork, simply cannot meet today’s expectations for timeliness, granularity or transparency. Verification invoices often exceed USD 6–8 per tCO₂e for small projects, eroding developer margins.

dMRV has emerged as the antidote: integrate satellites, sensors and secure ledgers to automate evidence gathering. But technology alone does not solve the “ground truth” gap—the need to confirm that what the pixels show, actually exists.

That is where Anaxee stakes its claim.


2  dMRV 101: Components, Standards & Jargon Busting

Digital Measurement, Reporting & Verification (dMRV) layers tech across the classic MRV triad.

Pillar Digital Enhancer Examples
Measurement Remote sensing, drones, IoT
Sentinel‑2 imagery; smart stove meters
Reporting Cloud dashboards, APIs
JSON data feeds to Verra’s Climate Check
Verification Immutable ledgers, AI anomaly detection
Hyperledger‑fabric records; ML leakage alerts

Key Standards to Know

-D‑VERA: Digital Guidance under Verra’s VM0047 methodology.

-Gold Standard Digital MRV Sandbox: Fast‑track protocols for tech‑enabled projects.

-ISO 14 064‑1:2023: Introduces digital data assurance clauses.

Tip for developers: Align your data schema with emerging open‑source ontologies like dMRV‑O to future‑proof registry integration.


3. Anaxee’s Origin Story: From Digital KYC to Climate KYC

Founded in 2016, Indore‑based Anaxee Digital Runners originally performed doorstep KYC verifications for banks and telecoms. By 2020 the company had assembled India’s largest gig‑enabled field network—Digital Runners—covering every second village.

In the same period, climate developers struggled to monitor dispersed assets such as agroforestry plots or rural cook‑stoves. Anaxee spotted the adjacency: replace KYC forms with “Climate KYC” tasks—geotagged photos, sapling girth measurements, sensor swaps—synced via the existing mobile app.

Pivot Year (2021): Anaxee signed its first carbon client—a 5,000‑ha bamboo agroforestry venture in Madhya Pradesh. The pilot cut verification time from 14 months to 6 months, attracting more projects and sparking a dedicated Climate Tech division.


4  Building the Tech Stack: Acquisition → Processing → Ledger → Insights

Infographic visualising Anaxee’s four-layer dMRV stack—Local-Scout Mobile Platform, Satellite Earth Observation, IoT Sensors and Data Analytics & Reporting—with icons and concise descriptions on teal background.

4.1 Data Acquisition Layer
  1. Satellites – 10‑m Sentinel‑2 and PlanetScope streams ingested via AWS Open‑Data.
  2. Drones – Hire‑per‑day VTOL drones capture <5 cm ortho‑mosaics for baseline plots.
  3. IoT Sensors – LoRaWAN soil‑moisture probes; GSM cook‑stove meters.
  4. Mobile Surveys – Runner app enforces photo+video evidence with AI on‑device QC.
4.2 Processing Layer

-AI Biomass Engine – CNN models classify tree species & diameter at crown spread with 92 % precision.
-Leakage Detector – Multi‑temporal NDVI change triggers human audit within 72 h.
-Sensor QA/QC – Dual‑channel median filters catch drift; flagged outliers auto‑dispatch a Runner.

4.3 Ledger Layer

-Hyperledger Fabric – Permissioned consortium chain co‑run with registry auditors.
-IPFS Storage – Stores raw imagery hashes for audit reproducibility.

4.4 Insights Layer

Custom dMRV Dashboard: Climate KPIs, geospatial heatmaps, CO₂e ticker.
-API Kit: Plug‑and‑play endpoints for Verra, Gold Standard, SAP Sustainability Control Tower.


5. Human‑in‑the‑Loop: Why Last‑Mile Validation Still Matters

Purely remote dMRV solutions often stumble on:

-Occult Tree Loss – Under‑storey sapling mortality invisible to satellites.

-Device Tampering – Stove users might remove SIM modules to save power.

Anaxee’s Digital Runners close these gaps:

-Presence Proof – Runners geotag each sapling, capturing 360° imagery.

-Sensor Integrity – Monthly field visits include QR‑coded photos, preventing ghost devices.

Each Runner earns ₹25–40 per task, converting idle time into income while ensuring data fidelity.


6. Navigating the Regulatory Maze: Article 6, NAPCC & Beyond

6.1 Article 6 of the Paris Agreement

UN supervisory bodies have signalled that digital reporting templates will become default. Anaxee’s ledger design aligns with the Article 6 Information Matrix, mapping every credit to a unique digital asset.

6.2 India’s National Action Plan on Climate Change (NAPCC)

Eight sub‑missions now encourage digital transparency. Anaxee’s APIs feed directly into the National Carbon Registry sandbox run by the Ministry of Environment.

6.3 Data Privacy & Security

Compliant with DPDP Act 2023: personal identifiers are tokenised; only statistical aggregates leave India’s borders.


7  Case Studies

7.1 Agroforestry & Trees‑Outside‑Forests (TOF)

-Location: Vidarbha, Maharashtra.

-Scale: 18,400 farmers, 11,900 ha.

-dMRV Edge: 3.2 million tree crowns mapped; Runner spot‑checks confirm 97 % model accuracy.

-Outcome: 125,000 credits issued at USD 9/tCO₂e, 68 % cost reduction vs manual MRV.

7.2 Clean Cooking & LPG Shift

-Households: 64,000 rural homes, Madhya Pradesh.

-Tech: GPRS stove meters; UPI micro‑payments.

-Impact: 1.7 tCO₂e avoided per home. Verification cycle compressed to quarterly, enabling rolling issuances.


8. Cost–Benefit Analysis: dMRV vs Legacy MRV

Metric Manual MRV Anaxee dMRV Delta
Verification Cost (USD/ha/yr) 14.5 4.2 −71 %
Issuance Lag (months) 14 5 −64 %
Auditor Site Visits 2/year Remote + 0.3 on‑site* −85 %
Farmer Revenue Share 51 % 68 % +17PP

*Average across 2024 projects.


9. Scaling Internationally: Kenya, Brazil & The Franchise Model

Kenya Pilot (2024): Partnered with local NGO to recruit 2,200 “Runner‑Lites” mapping agro‑pastoral land. API integration with Africa Carbon Exchange.

Brazil Pilot (2025): Mato Grosso regenerative cattle project. LoRa sensors on herd collars track methane proxies; Runner franchise handles sensor upkeep.

Franchise Blueprint:

  1. Train‑the‑Trainer model for data protocols.
  2. Revenue split: 30 % platform fee, 70 % local ops.
  3. Shared blockchain ledger ensures cross‑border auditability.

10. Challenges & Future Roadmap

Challenge Mitigation Strategy
Sensor Battery Life
Shift to energy‑harvesting IoT chips; Runner‑triggered battery swap alerts.
AI Bias on Minor Species
Incorporate spectral libraries from ICAR & Kew Gardens; active‑learning loops.
Data Sovereignty Jurisdictions Deploy sovereign cloud nodes via Azure Arc.
Scaling Runner Quality Gamified training app; quarterly certification exams.

Upcoming Features (H2 2025):

-Zero‑Knowledge MRV Proofs for privacy‑preserving validation.

-Generative AI dashboards auto‑explain anomalies to auditors.

-Tokenised Credit Marketplace enabling T+1 settlement for smallholders via CBDC‑compatible rails.


11  Conclusion: A Call for Collaborative Climate Infrastructure

Carbon markets cannot thrive on blind faith. They demand infrastructure of trust—transparent, verifiable and inclusive. Anaxee Digital Runners has demonstrated that the fusion of satellites, sensors and a human mesh network can deliver that trust at scale, putting more revenue into the hands of the rural communities who steward our planet’s carbon sinks.

Whether you are a corporate sustainability head, a registry auditor, or a project developer seeking scale, Anaxee’s dMRV playbook offers a proven path forward.


About Anaxee: 

Anaxee is India’s Reach Engine! we are building India’s largest last-mile outreach network of 100,000 Digital Runners (shared feet-on-street, tech-enabled) to help Businesses and Social Organizations scale to rural and semi-urban India, We operate in 26 states, 540+ districts, and 11,000+ pin codes in India.
We Help in last-mile execution of projects for (1) Corporates, (2) Agri-focused companies, (3) Climate, and (4) Social organizations. Using technology and people on-the-ground (our Digital Runners), we help in scale and execute projects across 100s of cities and bring 100% transparency in groundwork. We also work in the Tech for Climate domain, providing technology for the execution and monitoring of Nature-Based (NbS) and Community projects. Our technology & processes bring transparency and integrity into carbon projects across various methodologies (Agroforestry, Regen Agriculture, Solar devices, Improved Cookstoves, Water filters, LED lamps, etc.) worldwide.

-Book a Demo: sales@anaxee.com

Field Worker Sapling nursery agroforestry carbon project in India

 

Decoding dMRV: How Anaxee Is Pioneering Digital Carbon Measurement & Verification in India – and Beyond

Digital MRV (dMRV) is reshaping how carbon projects are measured and verified. India‑born Anaxee Digital Runners has built the country’s largest last‑mile data network, marrying human reach with satellite, sensor and AI workflows to cut verification costs by up to 70 % while speeding credit issuance by months. This in‑depth guide explores dMRV fundamentals, the global pivot to digitisation, India’s unique opportunity, and real‑world case studies of how Anaxee delivers trust and scale.

Infographic visualising dMRV definition with satellite, mobile analytics and CO₂-tracking factory icon against nature backdrop.

1. Introduction: The Race for Credible Carbon Data

The global carbon market crossed USD 1 trillion in traded value in 2024, yet more than one‑third of credits were flagged for quality concerns. Investors, corporates and regulators now demand evidence‑based impact before they will buy, retire or account for a tonne of CO₂e. Traditional monitoring, reporting and verification (MRV) models – clipboards, paper forms, sporadic field visits – simply can’t keep up. Enter digital MRV (dMRV): a technology‑driven framework that streams geospatial, sensor and human‑validated data in near real‑time, automates analytics and slashes subjectivity.

If MRV was the carbon market’s “trust but verify” mantra, dMRV upgrades it to “trust because you can verify at any time.” For climate projects operating across thousands of villages and hectares, the difference is transformative: lower verification costs, faster credit issuance and, most importantly, heightened credibility in the eyes of buyers and auditors.

In this long‑form guide (≈4,000 words), we unpack what dMRV really means, why it is rapidly becoming the new norm, and how Anaxee Digital Runners – an Indore‑based deep‑tech company – has emerged as a trailblazer powering India’s most ambitious nature‑based and household‑level carbon projects.


 2.  MRV vs dMRV –

MRV vs DMRV

A Quick Primer Measurement, Reporting & Verification (MRV) dates back to the Kyoto Protocol. It prescribes that every carbon project must:
  1. Measure baseline emissions and subsequent reductions or removals.
  2. Report findings in an auditable format.
  3. Verify data through a third‑party accredited body.

While robust in principle, legacy MRV workflows rely heavily on manual sampling and periodic site visits. A 2024 study by the LSE Grantham Institute estimated that up to 20 % of project costs can be swallowed by MRV overheads.

Enter dMRV

Digital MRV layers modern tech on top of the three pillars:

-Remote sensing & drones to capture canopy height, biomass and land‑use change.

-IoT sensors (soil probes, smart cook‑stove meters) for continuous data feeds.

-Machine learning to convert raw pixels and sensor noise into emissions factors.

-Blockchain or distributed ledgers for tamper‑proof records and transparent audit trails.

Key stat: A Gold Standard working group found that dMRV can cut verification costs by 40–70 % and compress credit issuance cycles by up to 12 months.

With market mechanisms like Article 6 of the Paris Agreement demanding ever faster, globally comparable data, dMRV is gaining near‑mandatory status.


3. Why dMRV Matters to the Voluntary & Compliance Carbon Markets

3.1 Speed

Faster verification means carbon revenues hit project developers’ accounts sooner, improving cash flow and enabling reinvestment in community benefits.

3.2 Accuracy & Integrity

Continuous monitoring reduces the risk of over‑ or under‑crediting. Transparent, tamper‑proof data logs improve buyer confidence and comply with stringent registries.

3.3 Scale

With automated analytics, a single verifier can oversee dozens of projects simultaneously, unlocking economies of scale previously impossible.

3.4 Equity

Lower transaction costs open the door for smallholder farmers, village bodies and micro‑entrepreneurs to participate in carbon markets – a game‑changer for rural economies.


4. The Global dMRV Landscape in 2025 From Silicon Valley start‑ups to UN‑backed think tanks, the race to build ‘infrastructure for trust’ is heating up.

RegionNotable PlayersSignature TechFocus Sector
North AmericaPachama, Regrow AgLiDAR + AI Forest ModelsForestry & Agriculture
EuropeSylvera, Climate TraceSatellites + MLGlobal MRV Scoring
AfricaBURN ManufacturingSmart‑metered cook‑stovesHousehold Energy
AsiaGreen Carbon, Netra TechMethane Sensors + BlockchainRice & Blue Carbon

India is fast emerging as the largest testbed for scalable dMRV, thanks to its vast rural landscapes, smartphone penetration and proactive policy support.


5.  India’s Moment: Policy, Demand & Innovation

  1. National Green Credit Programme (2023) – incentivises biodiversity, water conservation and carbon sequestration projects, all requiring stringent MRV.
  2. Startup India & Digital Public Goods – zero‑rating of GST on carbon credits and sandboxes for climate‑tech pilots.
  3. Corporate Net‑Zero Rush – Over 160 Indian companies have SBTi‑approved targets, driving demand for high‑quality local credits.

Combined, these forces make India ground zero for dMRV experimentation – and Anaxee sits squarely at the intersection of tech capability and last‑mile reach.


6.  Meet Anaxee:

India’s Largest Last‑Mile Climate Data Infrastructure Founded in 2016, Anaxee Digital Runners began as a distributed field‑data platform for banks and FMCG giants. Today, its 40,000‑strong ‘Digital Runners’ network covers 26 states, 7,000+ pin codes and 120,000 villages, making it India’s deepest boots‑on‑the‑ground data operation.

6.1 Core Strengths

-Human + Digital Hybrid: Runners validate satellite insights with geo‑tagged photos, ensuring on‑ground reality matches remote sensing output.

-Real‑Time Data Pipelines: A cloud dashboard visualises every tree, stove or sensor in near real‑time for project owners and auditors.

-Local Empowerment: Village‑level micro‑entrepreneurs earn revenue for each data task, injecting income into rural economies.


7.  Inside Anaxee’s dMRV Stack – People + Platform + Partnerships

LayerComponentsValue Add
AcquisitionDrone & satellite feeds, IoT probes, mobile app surveysMulti‑modal data lowers sampling bias
ProcessingAI tree‑species detection, sensor QA/QC, leakage algorithmsConverts raw data into verified emission factors
LedgerHyperledger‑fabric nodes + IPFS storageImmutable, auditable records satisfy registry requirements
InterfaceCustom dashboards, client APIs, automated auditor log‑insTransparency for corporates, registries, communities

Strategic tie‑ups with ISRO’s Bhuvan Portal and Azure FarmBeats provide high‑resolution imagery and agronomic models, while an MoU with IIT Kharagpur advances AI species‑classification.


8.  Project Snapshots: Agroforestry, Clean Cooking & Mangroves

8.1 Trees Outside Forests (TOF)

-Area: 12,000 ha across 45 villages in Maharashtra.

-Data Points: 2.8 million trees monitored via UAV + mobile app surveys.

-Outcome: Verification cost ₹52/ha/year vs ₹380 in manual MRV; first 50,000 credits issued in 11 months (70 % faster).

8.2 Clean Cooking for Tribal Households

-Scale: 60,000 smart‑metered LPG connections in Madhya Pradesh.

-dMRV Edge: Burner‑level sensors push usage data every 30 minutes, validated by monthly Runner visits.

-Impact: Average 1.6 tCO₂e avoided per household per year; credit payments disbursed via UPI.

8.3 Mangrove Restoration, Sundarbans Delta

-Area: 3,500 ha degraded coastline.

-Tech: Sentinel‑2 NDVI change detection + community photo transects.

-Projected Benefit: 1.2 million tonnes CO₂e removed over 30 years; blue‑carbon warrant enables upfront financing.


9.  Overcoming dMRV Challenges – Data Quality, Leakage & Permanence

-Sensor Drift & Calibration – Anaxee installs dual sensors per site and cross‑checks against Runner‑captured readings.

-Leakage Detection – Geofenced alerts flag land‑use change in buffer zones within 72 hours for corrective action.

-Permanence Risk – Parametric insurance via blockchain smart contracts auto‑pays for replanting if cyclones or fires are detected.

-Data Privacy – Differential‑privacy algorithms anonymise household‑level data while preserving aggregate accuracy.


10. Future Outlook: Article 6, Tokenisation & AI Automation

-Article 6 Trust Layer: With UN supervisory bodies signalling digital reporting templates, Anaxee’s modular APIs are Article 6‑ready.

-Instant Settlement: Tokenised credits on public‑permitted chains enable near‑instant payouts to smallholders.

-AI‑First MRV: Multispectral AI models will auto‑identify species and growth anomalies, enabling predictive maintenance of carbon assets.

-Global Expansion: Pilot projects in Kenya and Brazil leverage partner Runner networks under a franchise model.


11. Conclusion & Call to Action: 

The carbon market is no longer just about planting trees or switching fuels; it’s about proving, continuously and transparently, that those interventions work. Digital MRV is the engine of that proof, and Anaxee has built a uniquely Indian – and globally relevant – engine room.

Whether you are a corporate chasing net‑zero, a project developer seeking scale, or an investor hungry for verifiable impact, Anaxee Digital Runners offers the people, platform and proof to deliver high‑integrity credits at speed.

➡️ Ready to unlock credible, scalable climate impact? Email sales@anaxee.com to schedule a demo.


12. About Anaxee:

Anaxee is India’s Reach Engine! we are building India’s largest last-mile outreach network of 100,000 Digital Runners (shared feet-on-street, tech-enabled) to help Businesses and Social Organizations scale to rural and semi-urban India, We operate in 26 states, 540+ districts, and 11,000+ pin codes in India.
We Help in last-mile execution of projects for (1) Corporates, (2) Agri-focused companies, (3) Climate, and (4) Social organizations. Using technology and people on-the-ground (our Digital Runners), we help in scale and execute projects across 100s of cities and bring 100% transparency in groundwork. We also work in the Tech for Climate domain, providing technology for the execution and monitoring of Nature-Based (NbS) and Community projects. Our technology & processes bring transparency and integrity into carbon projects across various methodologies (Agroforestry, Regen Agriculture, Solar devices, Improved Cookstoves, Water filters, LED lamps, etc.) worldwide.

An Anaxee field worker photographs a ground-mounted solar panel array in a lush farm, documenting a solar-agriculture pilot in rural India.


 

Scope 1 & 2 Emission Accounting: Step‑by‑Step Calculations with Real Case Studies | Anaxee

Teaching Calculations: Emission Accounting for Scope 1 & Scope 2

When most sustainability manuals explain greenhouse‑gas (GHG) accounting, they bury you in jargon before getting to the numbers. This article flips the script. We focus squarely on Scope 1 and Scope 2 calculations, walking line‑by‑line through real‑world data sets from four Indian sectors:

  1. Cement manufacturing (heavy industry)
  2. Cloud data centre (service + power intensive)
  3. Bottled beverages plant (FMCG)
  4. Textile dyeing mill (SME)

For each case study we share raw activity data, pick the right emission factors, crunch the numbers, and reflect on what the results actually mean for management. All examples use FY 2024‑25 data, Indian grid factors, and IPCC Fifth Assessment defaults unless stated otherwise.

Note for beginners – We assume you already know what Scope 1 and Scope 2 are. If not, jump over to our previous primer on GHG boundaries, then hop back here for the math.


1. The Calculation Cheat‑Sheet

Before diving into sector specifics, let’s frame the generic formulas:

Infographic listing core formulas for combustion, process, and purchased-electricity emissions on a light-blue background.
Formula Cheat Sheet
Source TypeBasic Formula
Combustion (liquid fuels)Activity (litres) × EF (kg CO₂/L) × (1 – Oxidation Factor)
Combustion (gaseous fuels)Activity (scm or kWh) × EF (kg CO₂/unit)
Purchased ElectricityElectricity (kWh) × Grid EF (kg CO₂/kWh)
Purchased Steam / Chilled WaterEnergy (kWh) × Supplier EF (kg CO₂/kWh)

CH₄ and N₂O for fossil‐fuel combustion are normally added as CO₂‑equivalent using their global‑warming potentials (GWPs). We keep them visible in the cement example so you see the mechanics.

Quick tip – Always store ➞ unit conversions in a corner of your spreadsheet: 1 litre diesel ≈ 0.832 kg; 1 kg natural gas ≈ 1.25 scm (depends on calorific value).


2. Case Study 1 – Cement Plant in Andhra Pradesh
2.1 Activity Data Snapshot (FY 2024‑25)
ActivityUnitQuantity
Diesel for quarry trucksL2,500,000
Coal for kilnt135,000
Grid electricitykWh78,000,000
On‑site WHR* electricitykWh12,000,000

*WHR = waste‑heat recovery. Electricity from WHR is counted as zero‑carbon internal generation, not grid purchase.

2.2 Emission Factors Selected

-Diesel: 2.68 kg CO₂/L (IPCC default)

-Coal: 2.42 t CO₂/t (bituminous, India average)

-Grid EF (Southern grid, CEA 2024): 0.72 kg CO₂/kWh

2.3 Scope 1 Calculation – Diesel & Coal

Diesel (mobile)

2,500,000 L × 2.68 kg CO₂/L = 6,700,000 kg CO₂ ≈ 6,700 t

Coal (stationary)

135,000 t × 2.42 t CO₂/t = 326,700 t

CH₄ and N₂O minor: +0.5 % → 1,633 t CO₂e

Scope 1 subtotal: 334, (6,700 + 326,700 + 1,633) = 335,033 t CO₂e

2.4 Scope 2 Calculation – Purchased Grid Electricity
78,000,000 kWh × 0.72 kg CO₂/kWh = 56,160,000 kg = 56,160 t

Scope 2 location‑based: 56,160 t CO₂

No market‑based certificates were purchased, so the market‑based number is the same.

2.5 What Management Learned

– Kiln coal dominates (97 % of Scope 1). Even a 5 % thermal‑efficiency improvement would shave 16,000 t CO₂.

– Switching quarry trucks from diesel to electric would cut ~6,700 t—small in percentage terms but big PR value.

– Installing an extra 8 MW WHR turbine could offset another 40 GWh grid power, saving 28,800 t Scope 2.


3. Case Study 2 – Tier‑III Data Centre, Bengaluru
3.1 Activity Data
ActivityUnitQuantity
Grid electricity (including cooling)kWh42,000,000
Diesel for back‑up generatorsL420,000
3.2 Factors

-Bangalore BESCOM grid EF 2024: 0.79 kg CO₂/kWh

-Diesel EF: 2.68 kg CO₂/L

3.3 Scope 2 First (because it is huge)
42,000,000 × 0.79 = 33,180,000 kg = 33,180 t
3.4 Scope 1 Back‑up Diesel
420,000 L × 2.68 = 1,125,600 kg = 1,126 t
3.5 Outcome & Actions

-Electricity is 30× bigger than diesel. The company signed a 25‑year solar Open‑Access PPA for 30 GWh/yr.

-Market‑based Scope 2 will drop from 33,180 t to roughly 3,318 t once RECs are matched 90 % of the year.

-Diesel gensets run only 80 hours/year. Replacing with li‑ion battery UPS would also reduce Scope 1 spikes during testing.


4. Case Study 3 – Beverage Bottling Plant, Maharashtra
4.1 Activity Data
ActivityUnitQuantity
LPG for boilerst1,200
Purchased steam from neighbour CHPt steam85,000
Grid electricitykWh18,500,000
4.2 Factors

-LPG EF: 3.00 t CO₂/t LPG (WTT included)

-Steam supplier EF (metered): 0.25 t CO₂/t steam

-Western grid EF 2024: 0.78 kg CO₂/kWh

4.3 Calculations

LPG (Scope 1)

1,200 t × 3.00 = 3,600 t

Purchased Steam (Scope 2 – heat)

85,000 t × 0.25 = 21,250 t

Grid Electricity (Scope 2 – power)

18,500,000 kWh × 0.78 kg/kWh = 14,430 t
4.4 Result Summary
Scopet CO₂e
13,600
2 (power)14,430
2 (steam)21,250
Total Scope 235,680

Purchased steam is the surprise hotspot. Management is negotiating to co‑locate a biomass boiler that would slash Scope 2 by 70 %.


5. Case Study 4 – Textile Dyeing Mill, Tamil Nadu
5.1 Activity Data
ActivityUnitQuantity
Furnace oilL600,000
Grid electricitykWh9,600,000
5.2 Factors

-Furnace oil EF: 3.12 kg CO₂/L

-TN grid EF 2024: 0.69 kg CO₂/kWh

5.3 Calculations

Scope 1: Furnace Oil

600,000 L × 3.12 kg/L = 1,872,000 kg = 1,872 t

CH₄, N₂O negligible (<1 %).

Scope 2: Grid Power

9,600,000 kWh × 0.69 kg/kWh = 6,624,000 kg = 6,624 t

5.4 Insights

-Although a small SME, electricity is 3.5× larger than oil. Rooftop solar (2.5 MWp) can offset ~4,000 t Scope 2.

Bar chart comparing Scope 1 and Scope 2 CO₂ emissions across four sample industries (Manufacturing, Cement, Textile, Pharmaceutical).
Scope 1 vs Scope 2 Bar Chart

-Switching from furnace oil to LPG reduces both CO₂ and local particulates—useful for compliance with TN PCB.


6. Common Pitfalls When Teaching Scope 1 & 2 Accounting
  1. Mixing units – Litres vs kilograms. Embed conversion factors in your template.
  2. Wrong grid factor vintage – Always cite the reporting year (CEA publishes annually). Investors notice.
  3. Double counting captive renewables – If you own a rooftop solar array, subtract its kWh from grid purchase before applying the grid EF.
  4. Ignoring oxidation factors – Most liquid fuels are 100 %, but coal can be 98 %. Check IPCC tables.
  5. Rounding too early – Keep at least three significant figures through the math; round only in the final report.

7. Bringing It All Together – A Template Walk‑Through

Below is a simplified template header. Copy into Excel/Sheets and replicate rows per source.

SiteYearSourceFuel/UtilityUnitQuantityEFEF SourceScopet CO₂Notes

Populate Source with diesel genset, grid power, LPG boiler, etc. The formula for t CO₂ is simply Quantity*EF/1000 if EF is in kg CO₂/unit.

Pro hint – Colour‑code Scope 1 rows red and Scope 2 blue; the pattern helps non‑experts spot which bars must shrink.


8. FAQ – Calculation Edition

Q: Which emission‑factor database is “best” for India?
A: The Central Electricity Authority’s regional grid mix is mandatory for BRSR. For fuels, default to IPCC but cross‑check with India GHG Program if available.

Q: Do I count solar power I export?
A: Exported electricity is deducted from your grid import before calculating Scope 2. The residual export may be reported as avoided emissions in a footnote, but not subtracted from Scope 1.

Q: How to show location‑ vs market‑based numbers?
A: Two separate rows in your disclosure. Make it clear which one ties to targets and which one goes to CDP.


9. Key Takeaways for Trainers & Learners

-Always start with high‑quality activity data. Fancy EFs can’t rescue garbage inputs.

-Visualise the result (bar chart Scope 1 vs Scope 2) so management intuitively grasps priorities.

-Use sector‑relevant stories—cement, data centres, FMCG—because numbers stick when anchored in reality.

-Iterate annually; the more often teams run the calculations, the faster they spot anomalies and savings.


10. Conclusion

Scope 1 and Scope 2 may be “only” the first two slices of the carbon pie, but they often dictate over 90 % of what a company can directly control in the next five years. By mastering the calculations shown above- diesel, coal, LPG, grid electricity, and purchased steam—you arm yourself with a decision‑making compass.

From slashing diesel in quarry trucks to inking renewable‑energy PPAs, the path to lower emissions starts with a spreadsheet and a clear line of sight to each tonne of CO₂. Now roll up your sleeves, grab last year’s utility bills, and teach your team the math.


About Anaxee:

Anaxee is India’s Reach Engine! we are building India’s largest last-mile outreach network of 100,000 Digital Runners (shared feet-on-street, tech-enabled) to help Businesses and Social Organizations scale to rural and semi-urban India, We operate in 26 states, 540+ districts, and 11,000+ pin codes in India.
We Help in last-mile execution of projects for (1) Corporates, (2) Agri-focused companies, (3) Climate, and (4) Social organizations. Using technology and people on-the-ground (our Digital Runners), we help in scale and execute projects across 100s of cities and bring 100% transparency in groundwork. We also work in the Tech for Climate domain, providing technology for the execution and monitoring of Nature-Based (NbS) and Community projects. Our technology & processes bring transparency and integrity into carbon projects across various methodologies (Agroforestry, Regen Agriculture, Solar devices, Improved Cookstoves, Water filters, LED lamps, etc.) worldwide.

For More info or query, Connect with sales@anaxee.com

Drone based Tree Counting Agroforestry in India

GHG Accounting 101: Boundaries, Scope & Best Practices | Anaxee

Introduction to GHG Accounting: Boundaries & Scope

Greenhouse gas (GHG) accounting sounds technical—and, truth be told, it is a bit technical—but the basic idea is simple: we want to know how much climate‑warming gas an organisation is responsible for and what we can do to shrink that number. Whether you run a small factory in Indore or a multi‑site tech company with offices across India, a clear, consistent GHG inventory is the starting line of any credible climate programme.

In this guide we’ll walk through all the core building blocks—from the global standards and key definitions to the nitty‑gritty of emission factors and data templates—using plain language and plenty of real‑world examples. By the end you should feel confident setting the right boundaries, picking the right scope, and choosing calculation methods that fit your business reality.


1. What Is a GHG Inventory?

If you have ever kept a household budget, you already get the logic: list every source of income and expense, add it up, and see where the big numbers lie. A GHG inventory does the same for carbon—except instead of rupees we measure in tonnes of CO₂‑equivalent (tCO₂e).

Why it matters

✔️ Regulators in many countries, including India’s BRSR reporting, are nudging—or outright demanding—companies to disclose climate impacts.

✔️ Large customers push smaller suppliers to share carbon numbers before placing an order.

✔️ Investors watch the data to judge climate risk.

✔️ Internally, a first inventory often reveals surprising “hidden” hotspots that save real money once tackled.

A credible inventory must be complete, consistent, transparent, accurate, and re‑calculable. Those five words show up again and again in the standards, so keep them close.


2. The Standards: GHG Protocol and ISO 14064 / 14067

2.1 GHG Protocol

The Greenhouse Gas Protocol—developed by WRI and WBCSD—is the de‑facto global playbook. It is split into three main parts:

  1. Corporate Standard (organisational inventories)
  2. Project Protocol (specific projects like a solar farm)
  3. Scope 3 Standard (value‑chain emissions)

It lays out definitions for Scopes 1, 2, and 3, boundary setting, and reporting rules. Most assurance firms in India benchmark your report against this standard, even if you are also using ISO.

2.2 ISO 14064 (Parts 1, 2, 3)

ISO 14064 is a three‑part series:

PartFocusTypical User
1Organisational inventoriesCompanies, city governments
2ProjectsCarbon offset developers
3Verification & validationAuditors

ISO wording is more formal than the GHG Protocol but broadly compatible. Many Indian companies reference both to satisfy international buyers.

2.3 ISO 14067

This is the product carbon footprint cousin—handy when you need a cradle‑to‑grave footprint for a single product line.

Tip: Think of ISO 14064‑1 as company‑wide accounts and ISO 14067 as a product P&L. The math overlaps but the audiences differ.


3. Organizational vs Operational Boundaries

Before crunching numbers, decide whose emissions you include and which activities count.

Organizational boundary deals with ownership and control. If your firm owns 60 percent of a joint venture, do you count 60 percent of that JV’s diesel use or the whole 100? This is where consolidation approaches (next section) come in.

Operational boundary slices emissions into Scope 1, Scope 2, and Scope 3. You might fully own a warehouse (organisational control) but report only Scope 1 diesel generator use and Scope 2 grid electricity, while leaving third‑party trucking in Scope 3.

Getting these two boundaries clear up‑front avoids double‑counting later on.


4. Consolidation Approaches

  1. Equity Share – Account for emissions in proportion to your economic stake. Own 30 % of a plant? Take 30 % of its CO₂.
  2. Control Approaches
    • Financial Control – If you have the power to direct financial policies (even without full ownership), count 100 % of emissions.
    • Operational Control – If you run day‑to‑day operations (e.g., dispatch schedules), you take 100 %.

Most multinationals prefer operational control; it lines up neatly with decision‑making power. SMEs with simple structures often use equity share for ease.

How to choose?

-Use financial control when your corporate accounts already consolidate that way—keeps auditors happy.

-Use operational control if sustainability teams drive equipment upgrades but finance sits elsewhere.

Document the reasoning once. Changing approaches mid‑stream creates headaches.


5. Scope 1, Scope 2, Scope 3 Explained

Three-column infographic comparing Scope 1 direct, Scope 2 indirect (energy), and Scope 3 value-chain emissions with factory, wind turbine with solar panels, and delivery-truck icons

ScopeWhat it coversSimple example
Scope 1Direct emissions from sources you own or controlFuel burned in your diesel gensets
Scope 2Indirect emissions from purchased electricity, heat, steam, or coolingCO₂ from coal‑based power plants that feed your grid electricity
Scope 3All other indirect emissions across the value chainSupplier mining of iron ore, business travel, customer product use
Key takeaways

– Scope 1 is usually the smallest in a service company but the largest in heavy industry.

– Scope 2 often spikes if your site sits in a coal‑heavy grid region (think Chhattisgarh, Jharkhand).

– Scope 3 can dwarf the other two—up to 90 %—especially for consumer brands.

Don’t panic if Scope 3 data is messy on Day 1. Most firms phase it in: categories with good data first (business travel, purchased electricity); harder ones later (supplier primary data).


6. Emission Source Identification

Start with a brainstorm. Sit with facility managers, procurement folks, and a floor operator. List all activities that release GHGs. Common culprits:

-Stationary combustion: boilers, furnaces, gensets

-Mobile combustion: fleet trucks, forklifts, two‑wheelers

-Process emissions: cement calcination, ammonia production

-Fugitive emissions: refrigerant leaks (HFC‑134a), SF₆ from switchgear

-Purchased energy: grid electricity, district cooling

-Waste handling: anaerobic effluent lagoons, landfilled solid waste

Use site walk‑throughs and procurement records to cross‑check. The goal is thoroughness, not perfection at this stage.


7. Calculation Approaches

7.1 Combustion Sources

Most common formula:

Fuel Activity Data × Emission Factor × (1 − Oxidation Factor) = tCO₂e

Activity Data can be litres of diesel or kWh of LNG.

7.2 Process Emissions

For limestone calcination in a cement kiln:

Clinker Produced (t) × CaCO₃ Content (%) × Stoichiometric CO₂ Ratio
7.3 Fugitive Emissions

Refrigerant top‑up method:

(Refrigerant added during year) × GWP100 of gas

If equipment inventory is spotty, use mass‑balance or screening factors from IPCC.


8. Worked Examples

Example 1: Diesel Combustion

Factory generator used 12,000 litres of diesel in FY 2024‑25.

-IPCC default EF: 2.68 kg CO₂/litre

-Oxidation factor: 1 (diesel combusts fully)

12,000 L × 2.68 kg/L = 32,160 kg CO₂ = **32.16 tCO₂**

Add minor CH₄ and N₂O using defaults to get CO₂‑equivalent.

Example 2: HFC‑134a Leakage

Three chillers each charged with 12 kg HFC‑134a. Average annual leak rate: 12 %.

Charge (12 kg × 3) × Leak Rate 0.12 = 4.32 kg HFC‑134a

-GWP100 for HFC‑134a: 1,430

4.32 kg × 1,430 = 6,177.6 kg CO₂e ≈ **6.18 tCO₂e**

9. Emission Factors & Tiers

The IPCC and GHG Protocol talk about Tiers—basically the confidence level of your emission factor.

TierSource of FactorTypical Use Case
1Global or national defaultEarly‑stage inventories, SMEs
2Technology‑specific factorsSector averages (e.g., coal vs gas power plants)
3Direct measurement or supplier‑specific dataMature programmes, regulated facilities

Pro tip: Start Tier 1, graduate to Tier 2 for big hotspots, and aim for Tier 3 where it matters (e.g., steel billets, power plants).


10. Scope 2: Location‑Based vs Market‑Based

-Location‑based: Uses the average grid emission factor where your site sits. Good for benchmarking and mandatory disclosure.

-Market‑based: Lets you account for renewable energy purchases (RECs, PPAs) at supplier‑specific factors.

If you buy solar under an open‑access PPA, market‑based Scope 2 can drop dramatically—even to near‑zero—while location‑based stays unchanged. Many sustainability reports show both numbers side‑by‑side to avoid confusion.


11. Data Templates That Actually Work

A clean spreadsheet beats fancy software during the first year. Core columns to include:

ActivityUnitQuantityEmission FactorFactor SourceScopeEvidence
Diesel – GeneratorL12,0002.68 kg CO₂/LIPCC 20211Purchase invoices

Use dropdown lists for units and scopes to cut entry errors. Link evidence (PDF invoices, meter photos) inside the sheet or a shared drive.

Once volume grows, tools like Anaxee Carbon Track or Sphera can automate factor look‑ups, but don’t underestimate a tidy Excel.


12. Building an Ideal GHG Management System

  1. Policy & Governance – Board‑level mandate, clear roles.
  2. Boundary & Scope Definition – Document once, review annually.
  3. Data Collection Framework – Standardised templates, training for site staff.
  4. Emission Factor Library – Central, version‑controlled, updated yearly.
  5. Quality Assurance – Spot audits, automated checks, third‑party verification.
  6. Reduction Roadmap – Science‑based targets, capex plan, quick wins.
  7. Communication & Disclosure – Align with GRI, CDP, and India’s BRSR.
  8. Continuous Improvement – Year‑on‑year intensity reduction, digitalisation, supplier engagement.

Implementing all eight pillars turns GHG accounting from an annual chore into a strategic decision tool.


13. Conclusion

GHG accounting may feel overwhelming at first, but remember: the heaviest lift is simply getting started. Nail your boundaries, pick sensible emission factors, and be transparent about assumptions. As data quality improves, your reduction roadmap writes itself.

At Anaxee, we help organisations across India navigate this journey—whether it’s choosing a consolidation approach or setting up cloud‑based templates that cut reporting time in half. Ready to transform your carbon reporting into climate action? Get in touch today.


Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

Q1. Do I need third‑party verification?
Verification isn’t mandatory in India for all sectors yet, but large corporates seeking CDP leadership scores or international financing should budget for it.

Q2. How often should I update emission factors?
Best practice is annually. Grid factors, for instance, change as renewable capacity grows.

Q3. Are biogenic CO₂ emissions counted?
Report them separately. They don’t add to the fossil CO₂ total but must be disclosed.

Q4. Can I exclude de minimis sources?
Yes, but clearly define the threshold (e.g., <1 % of total emissions) and list what you left out.


About Anaxee: 

Anaxee is India’s Reach Engine! we are building India’s largest last-mile outreach network of 100,000 Digital Runners (shared feet-on-street, tech-enabled) to help Businesses and Social Organizations scale to rural and semi-urban India, We operate in 26 states, 540+ districts, and 11,000+ pin codes in India.
We Help in last-mile execution of projects for (1) Corporates, (2) Agri-focused companies, (3) Climate, and (4) Social organizations. Using technology and people on-the-ground (our Digital Runners), we help in scale and execute projects across 100s of cities and bring 100% transparency in groundwork. We also work in the Tech for Climate domain, providing technology for the execution and monitoring of Nature-Based (NbS) and Community projects. Our technology & processes bring transparency and integrity into carbon projects across various methodologies (Agroforestry, Regen Agriculture, Solar devices, Improved Cookstoves, Water filters, LED lamps, etc.) worldwide.

For More info or query, Connect with sales@anaxee.com

Field Worker Sapling nursery agroforestry carbon project in India

Climate Change Explained 2025 – CO₂, Global Warming, Paris Agreement, NDCs & Proof the Planet Is Heating Up

Introduction – Why This Matters Now

Climate change used to sound like a distant risk. In 2025 it is the daily context for business, policy and personal life. From record‑shattering heatwaves in India’s pre‑monsoon season to surging insurance costs after back‑to‑back cyclones, the signals are no longer abstract. This article unpacks the science and policy landscape behind those signals, using the latest publicly available numbers and reports so you can ground decisions in fact, not hype.


1. What Is Climate Change?

CO₂ levels are at 429.61 ppm – the highest in 800,000 years. Every molecule matters.

 

At its core, climate change is the long‑term shift in average weather patterns caused mainly by the accumulation of heat‑trapping gases in the atmosphere. Carbon dioxide (CO₂) is the headline molecule because it persists for centuries. NOAA’s Mauna Loa Observatory measured an average concentration of 429.61 ppm in June 2025, the highest in at least 800,000 years. Weekly data show levels staying above 428 ppm through mid‑July.

If those numbers feel abstract, NASA’s recent high‑resolution GEOS model animation makes them visceral by tracking CO₂ plumes in three dimensions over an entire year – reds swirling out of industrial belts, greens pulsing as forests inhale and exhale. The takeaway: every tonne emitted stays in circulation far longer than any of us will live, ratcheting the planetary thermostat upward.


2. Global Warming – From Numbers to Real‑World Heat

1.5°C warmer globally means extreme local impacts: from Delhi's heat to shrinking Himalayan glaciers.

 

“Global warming” is the symptom most people feel: higher land and ocean temperatures. NASA’s global temperature series shows Earth is now about 1.5 °C warmer than the 1951‑1980 baseline. That may sound small, but a single degree globally translates into extremes locally: a 50 °C heat index in Delhi, record coral bleaching in the Caribbean, and shrinking Himalayan glaciers feeding the Ganga. Ocean heat content has climbed relentlessly since the 1950s, storing the energy that later fuels stronger cyclones.

Sea level follows suit. Satellite altimetry records reveal an accelerating rise, driven by melting ice sheets and thermal expansion.  Meanwhile, September Arctic sea‑ice extent is contracting by 12.2 % per decade. Add in NASA’s GRACE data on hydrological extremes, and the pattern is clear: we have entered an age of “hydro‑climatic whiplash,” swinging from drought to flood with little warning.


3. Global & National Emissions Snapshot (2024 Data)

37.8 Gt CO₂ in 2024. India's emissions grew 4.6%, reflecting dual challenges: growth and climate risk.

 

Energy‑related CO₂ emissions hit 37.8 Gt in 2024 – an 0.8 % rise and another all‑time high according to the IEA’s Global Energy Review 2025. The Global Carbon Project puts total fossil‑fuel CO₂ at 41.2 Gt, noting record wildfire contributions.

-China & USA still account for 45 % of fuel‑combustion CO₂, but India’s emissions grew 4.6 % in 2024, reflecting rapid power and transport demand.

-The EU and US declined slightly, proving that decoupling is possible but not yet fast enough.

India’s absolute energy‑sector CO₂ is now roughly 2.6 Gt CO₂‑eq, fourth globally, with coal still dominant but solar posting record additions. For Indian businesses, this duality – growth plus rising climate risk – frames every supply‑chain and investment decision.


4. The Paris Agreement – A Living Framework

Aiming for 1.5°C, but current pledges fall short. The Paris Agreement demands continuous ambition.

 

Signed in 2015, the Paris Agreement’s central aim is to hold warming “well below 2 °C” and ideally to 1.5 °C. Virtually every nation is a Party, meaning nearly 100 % of global GDP is covered. Yet UNEP’s emissions‑gap assessments show current pledges point toward ~2.5‑2.7 °C this century, even if fully implemented. The Agreement’s strength lies in its five‑year ambition cycle: each round of Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs) must enhance or expand previous targets.


5. NDC & LT‑LEDS – Roadmaps, Not Wish‑Lists

NDCs: Short-term targets. LT-LEDS: Long-term pathways. Both critical for a low-emission future.

 

NDCs set short‑ to mid‑term (5‑ to 10‑year) targets; Long‑Term Low‑Emission Development Strategies (LT‑LEDS) sketch pathways to mid‑century neutrality. As of September 2024, the UNFCCC had logged 168 latest NDCs covering 95 % of 2019 emissions. Since then, more updates have trickled in and the secretariat reminds Parties that “NDC 3.0” submissions are due by the end of 2025, shaped by the first global stock‑take.

On LT‑LEDS, 78 Parties (including big emitters like China, the EU, the US and most recently Peru and Equatorial Guinea) have tabled strategies as of June 2025. While these plans vary in detail, they give investors signals about future carbon pricing and renewable‑energy opportunities.


6. IPCC’s National Accounting Approach – Getting the Numbers Right

Rigorous IPCC methods ensure we accurately track emissions across all gases and sectors.

 

 Behind every headline figure is a rigorous methodology. The IPCC’s 2006 Guidelines (refined in 2019) provide the default framework for national greenhouse‑gas inventories, defining sectors, gases, tiers of complexity and default emission factors. Inventory agencies must:

  1. Cover all gases: CO₂, CH₄, N₂O and fluorinated gases.

  2. Avoid double counting between sectors (e.g., land‑use and energy).

  3. Continuously improve accuracy through higher‑tier methods as data allow.

This “national accounting” may sound bureaucratic, but without it we would not know whether climate actions are real or merely press releases.


7. Greenhouse Gases – The Official Classification

The data is clear: rising CO₂, record temperatures, melting ice, rising seas, and extreme weather.

 

The IPCC groups heat‑trapping gases into four principal buckets:

-Carbon dioxide (CO₂) – fossil fuel combustion, cement, land‑use change.

-Methane (CH₄) – agriculture, fossil‑gas leaks, waste.

-Nitrous oxide (N₂O) – fertiliser use, industrial processes.

-Fluorinated gases (HFCs, PFCs, SF₆, NF₃) – refrigerants, electronics.

Between 1990 and 2019, CO₂ from fossil fuels grew 67 %, CH₄ 29 %, N₂O 33 %, while F‑gases skyrocketed 254 % albeit from a small base. Each gas has a “global warming potential” expressing its heat‑trapping punch over 100 years; SF₆, for instance, is over 23,000 times stronger than CO₂.


8. Evidence of Climate Change – The Smoking Gun(s)

The data is clear: rising CO₂, record temperatures, melting ice, rising seas, and extreme weather.

 

Multiple, independent lines of observation converge:

-Atmosphere – CO₂ now above 429 ppm; methane > 1,900 ppb.

-Temperature – 2024 became the hottest year on record, with every month since June 2023 exceeding the 1.5 °C threshold briefly.

-Cryosphere – Arctic summer ice retreating 12 % per decade; Greenland and Antarctica losing mass at accelerating rates.

-Sea level – Rising faster than at any period in the last 2,500 years.

-Extreme weather – NASA’s GRACE data show a doubling in the frequency of severe drought‑flood swings in the last five years.

Together, these datasets demolish the notion that recent warming is “natural variability.”


9. Status of NDC Submissions (July 2025)

Despite a UN deadline earlier this year, only about a dozen Parties accounting for 16.2 % of global emissions met the cut‑off, prompting the secretariat to prioritise quality over speed. Monaco’s fresh 2025 NDC arrived on 16 July, illustrating how updates are still landing almost weekly. Analysts expect a late‑2025 surge as major economies finalize their post‑stock‑take targets; whether ambition rises fast enough is the make‑or‑break question heading into COP 31.


Conclusion – What Comes Next?

The science leaves no doubt: the physical climate system is changing in lock‑step with rising greenhouse‑gas concentrations. Policy instruments like the Paris Agreement, NDCs and LT‑LEDS provide a governance scaffold, but their effectiveness hinges on honest accounting and rapid implementation.

For businesses operating in India and beyond, the direction of travel is clear: carbon‑intensive growth strategies face mounting physical and regulatory risks, while low‑carbon solutions unlock growing markets and capital flows. The companies that align now – auditing supply‑chain emissions, investing in renewables, backing nature‑based solutions – will be the ones still competitive when the next round of NDCs tightens the screws.

Stay tuned: the next 18 months, culminating in NDC 3.0, will set the trajectory for global emissions through 2035. Whether we write a story of managed transition or chaotic disruption depends on choices being made today.

About Anaxee: 

Anaxee is India’s Reach Engine! we are building India’s largest last-mile outreach network of 100,000 Digital Runners (shared feet-on-street, tech-enabled) to help Businesses and Social Organizations scale to rural and semi-urban India, We operate in 26 states, 540+ districts, and 11,000+ pin codes in India.
We Help in last-mile execution of projects for (1) Corporates, (2) Agri-focused companies, (3) Climate, and (4) Social organizations. Using technology and people on-the-ground (our Digital Runners), we help in scale and execute projects across 100s of cities and bring 100% transparency in groundwork. We also work in the Tech for Climate domain, providing technology for the execution and monitoring of Nature-Based (NbS) and Community projects. Our technology & processes bring transparency and integrity into carbon projects across various methodologies (Agroforestry, Regen Agriculture, Solar devices, Improved Cookstoves, Water filters, LED lamps, etc.) worldwide.

For More info or query, Connect with sales@anaxee.com


Sources:

  1. NOAA Global Monitoring Laboratory NOAA Global Monitoring Laboratory – “Monthly Average Mauna Loa CO₂,” last updated 14 Jul 2025.

  2. NASA Scientific Visualization Studio NASA Scientific Visualization Studio – “Visualizing Global CO₂ with the GEOS Model,” 2024.

  3. NASA NASA – “Temperatures Rising: 2024 Warmest Year on Record,” press release, Jan 2025.

  4. IEA Blob Storage International Energy Agency – Global Energy Review 2025 (PDF), Mar 2025.

  5. Global Carbon Budget Global Carbon Project – “Fossil‑Fuel CO₂ Emissions Increase Again in 2024,” 13 Nov 2024.

  6. UNFCCC UNFCCC – 2024 NDC Synthesis Report (covers 168 latest NDCs), Sep 2024.

  7. UNFCCC UNFCCC – “Long‑Term Low‑Emission Development Strategies Portal,” accessed 17 Jul 2025.

  8. ipcc-nggip.iges.or.jp IPCC TFI – 2019 Refinement to the 2006 Guidelines for National GHG Inventories.

  9. National Snow and Ice Data Center National Snow & Ice Data Center – “September Arctic Sea‑Ice Extent Decline of 12.2 % per Decade,” Oct 2024.

  10. GRACE Tellus NASA GRACE Tellus – “Water‑Cycle Extremes: Droughts and Pluvials,” 2023.

  11. The Times of India Times of India – “NASA Data Warns of Surge in Extreme Weather Events,” 17 Jun 2025.

CCTS Draft 2025: India’s Top Paper & Pulp Plants and Their Carbon Targets

 

India’s Paper Industry and the Carbon Market: CCTS 2025 Explained:

What’s Happening?

With the CCTS Draft Notification of June 2025, India’s government has put a hard number on how much CO₂ the biggest industrial plants are allowed to emit- measured in GHG Emission Intensity (GEI). This includes the pulp & paper industry, which now joins steel, cement, and fertilizers under India’s formal carbon market umbrella.

Each listed paper unit has been:

-Assigned a baseline GEI (tonnes of CO₂ per tonne of paper produced),

-And a reduction target for the next two years: 2025–26 and 2026–27.

If they go above the target — they’ll have to buy carbon credits.
If they beat it — they can earn and sell credits.

Simple rules. Big implications.


Why the Paper Industry?

Paper may look clean, but the process behind it is energy-heavy and carbon-intensive.

Here’s why India’s pulp and paper sector matters for climate action:

Factor Impact
Biomass & Coal Many plants still rely on solid fuels for steam & heat.
Water-heavy process Adds energy use via pumping, treating, heating.
Captive power Many have internal plants running on coal or furnace oil.
Process emissions Pulping, bleaching, and drying steps are GHG intensive.

India’s paper sector is estimated to emit 10–15 million tonnes of CO₂ annually. That’s more than the entire emissions of Bhutan.


Full List: India’s Major Paper Plants Under CCTS 2025

Here’s a table of the 20 paper & pulp plants across India included in the CCTS Draft. This includes both private and government-linked manufacturers.

No Plant   State Baseline_Output_tonnes Baseline_GEI_tCO2_per_t Target_GEI_2025_26 Target_GEI_2026_27
1 Ballarpur Industries – Ballarpur Unit Maharashtra 137222 2.38 2.34 2.31
2 JK Paper Ltd – Rayagada Unit Odisha 136226 2.13 2.1 2.07
3 West Coast Paper Mills – Dandeli Karnataka 167432 2.42 2.38 2.35
4 Tamil Nadu Newsprint & Papers Ltd (TNPL) Tamil Nadu 385688 1.88 1.85 1.82
5 Century Pulp & Paper – Lalkuan Uttarakhand 375523 2.56 2.52 2.48
6 ITC Ltd – Bhadrachalam Paperboards Telangana 122296 2.12 2.09 2.06
7 Emami Paper Mills – Balasore Odisha 156139 2.86 2.82 2.77
8 Naini Papers – Kashipur Uttarakhand 249081 1.66 1.64 1.61
9 Yash Pakka Ltd – Ayodhya Uttar Pradesh 309747 1.75 1.72 1.7
10 NR Agarwal Industries Ltd – Vapi Gujarat 176575 2.71 2.67 2.63
11 Kuantum Papers Ltd – Saila Khurd Punjab 175399 1.22 1.2 1.18
12 Orient Paper & Industries Ltd – Amlai Madhya Pradesh 254457 2.27 2.24 2.2
13 Star Paper Mills Ltd – Saharanpur Uttar Pradesh 347243 1.35 1.33 1.31
14 Seshasayee Paper & Boards – Erode Tamil Nadu 176673 2.43 2.39 2.36
15 Andhra Paper Ltd – Rajahmundry Andhra Pradesh 101315 1.52 1.5 1.47
16 The Andhra Pradesh Paper Mills – Kadiyam Andhra Pradesh 143852 2.69 2.65 2.61
17 Abhishek Industries – Trident Paper Division Punjab 368839 1.43 1.41 1.39
18 Bindals Papers Mills Ltd – Muzaffarnagar Uttar Pradesh 243992 2.89 2.85 2.8
19 Genus Paper & Boards Ltd – Moradabad Uttar Pradesh 305774 1.8 1.77 1.75
20 Pudumjee Paper Products – Pune Maharashtra 352265 2.45 2.41 2.38

 


What the Table Tells Us

-GEI values range from 1.0 to 3.0 tCO₂/t — a huge variation showing gaps in technology.

-The biggest plants (like TNPL, ITC Bhadrachalam, Century Pulp) have better economies of scale and likely lower GEI.

-Several Uttar Pradesh units (Muzaffarnagar, Moradabad) appear on the list—this region is paper-dense but tech-light.

-Odisha and Tamil Nadu dominate the east and south belt.


What These Targets Mean (Financially)

Let’s break it down for one plant.

Example: JK Paper – Rayagada

-Output: 1.3 lakh tonnes
-GEI (2023–24): 2.13
-Target (2026–27): 2.07
-Gap = 0.06 tCO₂/t

Total excess = 1.3 lakh × 0.06 = 7,800 tCO₂

If carbon price is ₹1,200 per tonne → ₹93.6 lakh liability
But if they beat the target? That’s ₹93.6 lakh in credit revenue.

Multiply that by 20 plants and 2 years — the total opportunity/liability is in hundreds of crores.


What Can Paper Plants Do?

An infographic detailing decarbonization strategies for paper plants, including switching to cleaner fuel (solar, biogas), heat recovery and cogeneration, using renewable electricity, water and effluent optimization, and applying for offset credits.

 

You can’t just “green” a paper mill overnight. But here’s what leading units are doing:

1. Switch to Cleaner Fuel

-Biomass → Biogas → Green hydrogen (long term)
-TNPL has shifted to 100% biomass boiler ops in some units.

2. Heat Recovery & Cogeneration

-Steam traps, condensate recovery, waste heat boilers
-Century Pulp saved ~11% of energy this way.

3. Switch to Renewable Electricity

-3–5 MW solar for daytime pulp section
-Paper drying still remains hard to decarbonize

4. Water & Effluent Optimization

-Energy saved per kL treated = ~0.5–0.8 kWh
-Naini Papers has reduced water use by 30% over 5 years.

5. Apply for Offset Credits

-Agroforestry (in sourcing regions)
-Biochar (from paper sludge waste)
-Wastewater methane recovery


Who Might Struggle?

Plant Risk Factor
Bindals (Muzaffarnagar) Older tech, lower automation
Genus Paper (Moradabad) Wastepaper recycling may still emit
Orient Paper (MP) High coal usage, legacy system


Who Could Be Sellers?

Plant Why?
TNPL Biomass-fed, green-energy leaning
Century Pulp High efficiency, newer systems
JK Paper Consistent upgrade cycles, RE investments


What’s the Role of Anaxee?

Anaxee can help these plants earn credits, monitor emissions, and verify offsets with its all-India last-mile network. Especially for:

-Agroforestry credit documentation

-Paper sludge → biochar projects

-Capturing ground-level RE projects for MRV

-GPS & timestamped field data for validation

📍 Your verifier needs field photos?
📍 Need to geo-tag saplings at 200 locations?
📍 Want to track methane from sludge lagoons?

Anaxee does it—digitally, on time, at scale.


Final Thoughts

India’s paper mills are stepping into carbon accounting for the first time. The CCTS framework is a wake-up call, but also an opportunity.

Companies that embrace energy efficiency and credit tracking early will profit.

Those who delay?
They’ll be stuck buying credits from those who didn’t.


Want to Track Your Carbon & Earn Credits?

If you’re a paper manufacturer or a consultant working with mills — talk to Anaxee’s Climate Team, at sales@anaxee.com

We’ll help you:

-Monitor your GEI

-Launch a real offset project (Nature based Projects)

-And verify everything, ground-up.


About Anaxee:
Anaxee is India’s Reach Engine! we are building India’s largest last-mile outreach network of 100,000 Digital Runners (shared feet-on-street, tech-enabled) to help Businesses and Social Organisations scale to rural and semi-urban India, We operate in 26 states, 540+ districts, and 11,000+ pin codes in India.

We Help in last-mile execution of projects for (1) Corporates, (2) Agri-focussed companies, (3) Climate, and (4) Social organizations. Using technology and people on-the-ground (our Digital Runners), we help in scale and execute projects across 100s of cities and bring 100% transparency in groundwork. We also work in the Tech for Climate domain, providing technology for the execution and monitoring of Nature-Based (NbS) and Community projects. Our technology & processes bring transparency and integrity into carbon projects across various methodologies (Agroforestry, Regen Agriculture, Solar devices, Improved Cookstoves, Water filters, LED lamps, etc.) worldwide.

Field Worker Sapling nursery agroforestry carbon project in India

 

CCTS Draft 2025: India’s Top Chemical & Fertilizer Plants and Their Carbon Targets

CCTS Draft 2025 Targets India’s Chemical & Fertilizer Sector

“From urea bags to sulfuric tanks, the chemistry of India’s green transition starts here.”

With the release of the CCTS Draft Notification (June 2025), India’s vast chemical and fertilizer industry finds itself front and center in the country’s decarbonization drive. The scheme assigns GHG Emission Intensity (GEI) targets to the biggest ammonia, urea, and industrial chemical producers—most of whom are household PSU names.

If your plant exceeds the target? You’ll have to buy carbon credits.

If you perform better? You get to sell them.

This blog breaks down the entire chemical/fertilizer list under the CCTS 2025 draft: who’s in, what targets they’ve been given, and what it all means for your operations, strategy, or climate alignment.


Why Chemical Manufacturing Matters

India’s chemical sector is big, dirty, and surprisingly under-scrutinized. Here’s why it’s in the CCTS spotlight now:

-Energy-intensive operations – Ammonia synthesis (Haber-Bosch) is highly carbon-intensive.

-Fossil feedstocks – Most plants still use natural gas or naphtha as raw material.

-Process emissions – You can’t scrub all of it; some emissions are inherent to reactions.

-Heavy water and steam usage – Adds significant Scope 2 emissions via captive power.

Rough estimate? The chemical and fertilizer sector in India emits close to 70–90 million tonnes of CO₂e annually.


What the CCTS Draft Says
CCTS 2025 Chemical Fertilizer Framework

Under the draft, each identified plant is:

-Assigned a baseline GEI (measured as tCO₂e per tonne of product output).

-Given reduction targets for FY 2025–26 and 2026–27.

-Expected to self-report data and undergo verification for carbon credit allocation.

And now, let’s look at the real players.


Complete List of India’s Major Chemical Plants Under CCTS 2025

Below is a table of the 20 top chemical and fertilizer manufacturing units across India that fall under the Draft 2025 notification. It includes their baseline output, current emission intensity, and targets.

 
No Plant State Baseline_Output_tonnes Baseline_GEI_tCO2_per_t Target_GEI_2025_26 Target_GEI_2026_27
1 RCF – Trombay Chemical Complex Maharashtra 1206858 1.69 1.66 1.64
2 RCF – Thal Ammonia Unit Maharashtra 1416122 1.45 1.43 1.41
3 Gujarat Narmada Valley Fertilizers – Bharuch Gujarat 1103739 1.7 1.67 1.65
4 GSFC – Vadodara Plant Gujarat 1259392 1.75 1.72 1.7
5 IFFCO – Kalol Unit Gujarat 372108 1.66 1.64 1.61
6 IFFCO – Phulpur Ammonia Unit Uttar Pradesh 303430 2 1.97 1.94
7 NFL – Panipat Unit Haryana 708840 2.3 2.27 2.23
8 NFL – Nangal Unit Punjab 445894 1.46 1.44 1.42
9 NFL – Bathinda Unit Punjab 618713 2.57 2.53 2.49
10 Chambal Fertilizers – Gadepan Rajasthan 927432 1.72 1.69 1.67
11 Tata Chemicals – Babrala Plant Uttar Pradesh 547792 1.73 1.7 1.68
12 Deepak Fertilisers – Taloja Maharashtra 1067385 2.32 2.29 2.25
13 Zuari Agro – Goa Goa 526786 1.55 1.53 1.5
14 MCF – Mangalore Chemicals & Fertilizers Karnataka 1328308 2.51 2.47 2.43
15 Kribhco – Hazira Fertilizer Plant Gujarat 1298149 1.44 1.42 1.4
16 Indo Gulf Fertilisers – Jagdishpur Uttar Pradesh 451806 2.07 2.04 2.01
17 FACT – Udyogamandal Complex Kerala 1218905 2.34 2.3 2.27
18 FACT – Cochin Division Kerala 1194638 2.55 2.51 2.47
19 Smartchem Technologies – Dahej Gujarat 912171 1.44 1.42 1.4
20 GNFC – Ammonia Plant II Gujarat 775859 2.1 2.07 2.04

Observations From the List

-RCF, IFFCO, NFL, and FACT dominate—India’s state PSUs still hold the ammonia keys.

-Gujarat is the hub, with ~7 out of 20 plants.

-GEI ranges from 1.4 to 2.6, depending on age, technology, and feedstock.

-Big producers (RCF, GNFC, Chambal) face the biggest compliance pressure due to scale.


Credit Liability & Opportunity – Real Example
A visual representation of the carbon credit liability or opportunity using the NFL Panipat example. This could be a before-and-after visual or a calculation breakdown showing "Output," "Baseline GEI," "Target GEI," "Gap," "Total CO2e Liability," and "Financial Impact (Cost/Revenue)." Use clear numbers and potentially a red/green color scheme to indicate cost vs. opportunity.

Let’s take NFL Panipat. Assume:

-Output: 1.2 million tonnes

-GEI 2023–24: 2.5 tCO₂e/t

-2026–27 Target: 2.43 tCO₂e/t

-Gap: 0.07 tCO₂e/t

That’s 84,000 tonnes of CO₂e liability in FY 2026–27. At ₹1,200/t average carbon price? That’s over ₹10 crore in additional cost—or carbon credit revenue if they perform better.


What Plants Can Do To Hit Targets

“There’s no one trick. You’ll need heat integration, cleaner hydrogen, and smarter data.”

An infographic showcasing the five key strategies for chemical and fertilizer plants to meet their CCTS targets. Each strategy should have a dedicated section with an icon: "Switch to Green Hydrogen" (e.g., a green H2 molecule), "Energy Efficiency Upgrades" (e.g., gears or a lightbulb), "Use Renewable Power" (e.g., a solar panel or wind turbine), "Flare Gas Capture & Reuse" (e.g., a flare stack with a capture system), and "Offsets via Agroforestry" (e.g., a tree or forest).

 

1. Switch to Green Hydrogen (even partially)

– Every 1% replacement cuts ~0.02 tCO₂e/t urea.

– Blending 10% is becoming feasible with falling green hydrogen costs.

2. Energy Efficiency Upgrades

-Condensate recovery systems, VFDs on compressors, improved burners.

-GSFC saved ~8% CO₂ with ₹35 crore in upgrades.

3. Use Renewable Power

-RE PPAs now widespread. FACT Cochin is already running a 20 MW solar integration.

4. Flare Gas Capture & Reuse

-Several Maharashtra-based plants have started capturing excess flare gases for power.

5. Offsets via Agroforestry

-Several plants have CSR initiatives—now these can generate credits if verified.

-Anaxee can digitize and monitor these using its Runner network.


Who Will Likely Need to Buy Credits?

Who Can Sell Credits?

How Anaxee Can Help

Let’s be honest—most chemical plants don’t have the time or staff to verify agroforestry or energy projects on their own. That’s where Anaxee’s 50,000+ Digital Runners come in.

We can:

-Digitally verify biomass sourcing

-Monitor RE installations

-Collect ground data for tree-planting or biochar offsets

-Ensure your verifier gets timestamped GPS-tagged records

Result: More credits, less hassle, and stronger ESG reporting.


FAQ – Common Industry Questions

Q: Are small fertilizer plants included in the CCTS Draft?
A: No. Only large plants above a certain output threshold are covered under the mandatory compliance.

Q: Can two plants pool their credits?
A: Not directly. Credits are account-specific but can be traded. Group companies can consolidate strategies, though.

Q: What if a plant shuts down during 2026–27?
A: They’re still liable for the portion of operation covered in that compliance period unless formally delisted.


Summary

-20 major chemical and fertilizer plants are listed under the CCTS Draft 2025.

-Each has a GEI baseline and two-year reduction trajectory.

-Credit compliance costs or revenues could hit crores.

-Action starts with MRV and verified projects—Anaxee offers full-stack support.


Talk to Anaxee Climate Desk

Need help planning your compliance strategy or verifying an offset project in a rural district? Connect with us at sales@anaxee.com. Anaxee has the tools, people, and tech to make it easy.

Let’s partner on your CCTS roadmap.

About Anaxee:
Anaxee is India’s Reach Engine! we are building India’s largest last-mile outreach network of 100,000 Digital Runners (shared feet-on-street, tech-enabled) to help Businesses and Social Organisations scale to rural and semi-urban India, We operate in 26 states, 540+ districts, and 11,000+ pin codes in India.
We Help in last-mile execution of projects for (1) Corporates, (2) Agri-focussed companies, (3) Climate, and (4) Social organizations. Using technology and people on-the-ground (our Digital Runners), we help in scale and execute projects across 100s of cities and bring 100% transparency in groundwork. We also work in the Tech for Climate domain, providing technology for the execution and monitoring of Nature-Based (NbS) and Community projects. Our technology & processes bring transparency and integrity into carbon projects across various methodologies (Agroforestry, Regen Agriculture, Solar devices, Improved Cookstoves, Water filters, LED lamps, etc.) worldwide.Field Worker Sapling nursery agroforestry carbon project in India